Women in English Life from Mediæval to Modern Times, Vol. IHill, Georgiana
History
Women in English Life from Mediæval to Modern Times, Vol. I
Hill, Georgiana
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
There were, of course, pretenders among the numerous claimants, people
who, as the duchess avers, “made it their trade to solicit.”
As a rule, however, women in everyday life were secluded from the
bustle of public affairs. According to Walpole, after the Restoration,
the really respectable, well-conducted members of the female sex
were neither seen nor heard outside their own home circle. That they
led very dull lives seems pretty obvious, for they had neither the
resources of learning and culture nor the distractions of society. But
they enjoyed more personal freedom than women on the Continent. The
Prince of Tuscany, who visited England, observes of the women--
“They live with all the liberty that the custom of the country
authorizes. This custom dispenses with that rigorous constraint
and reservedness which are practised by the women of other
countries, and they go whithersoever they please, either alone
or in company.”
Gentlewomen of good position were accustomed, in the seventeenth
century, to live in a simple way, within the four walls of their home,
occupied with domestic affairs. The wife of Sir John Coke, who was
Secretary of State in the reign of Charles I., when she writes to her
husband from the country, discourses to him of the children and of the
needlework she is doing for the baby in homely fashion, and thanks
him for sending her a new gown and hat, as if she were unused to fine
clothes. Lady Anne Halkett, who played a notable part in the political
troubles of her day, lived a quiet life enough when public affairs did
not demand her attention, and spent her time like any good housewife.
She was fond of gathering herbs and compounding powders and conserves
for the sick poor.
“She was ever imployed either in doing or reaping good: in the
summer season she vyed with the bee or ant, in gathering herbs,
flowers, worms, snails, etc., for the still or limbeck, for the
mortar or boyling pan, etc., and was ordinarily then in a dress
fitted for her still-house; making preparations of extracted
waters, spirits, ointments, conserves, salves, powders, etc.,
which she ministred every Wednesday to a multitude of poor
infirm persons, besides what she dayly sent abroad to persons
of all ranks who consulted her in their maladies.”
Mary Astell, however, who was so anxious about the intellectual
advancement of her sex, blames Englishwomen for not excelling in the
domestic talents, and upholds the example of the Dutch women, who, she
says, not only manage all the household affairs, but--
“keep the books, balance the accounts, and do all the business
with as much dexterity and exactness as their own or our men
can do.”
Englishwomen could certainly not have coped with accounts if their
arithmetic were on a par with their spelling. But they appear to have
had complete control over domestic matters, or at least to have
impressed foreigners with that belief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account