| L. Tattersall | 0 6 10 | 0 7 0 | 0 6 6 | 0 7 0 | | E. Treacher | 0 5 3½ | 0 5 6 | 0 5 2½ | 0 3 8½ | | M. Davis | 0 9 1½ | 0 9 0 | 0 9 7 | 0 7 0¼ | | E. Griffiths | 0 7 5 | 0 7 3½ | 0 7 0 | 0 7 0½ | | M. Clarke | 0 8 10½ | 0 9 3½ | 0 9 0 | 0 7 1½ | | M. Perkins | 0 7 3½ | 0 6 10 | 0 7 7½ | 0 5 0½ | | E. Marshall | 0 7 0 | 0 6 1½ | 0 6 6 | 0 4 8½ | | G. Trimnell | 0 6 2½ | 0 5 5¾ | 0 4 2½ | 0 2 11 | | H. Night | 0 6 1½ | 0 5 10½ | 0 6 0 | 0 4 3 | | M. Norcott | 0 5 10 | 0 6 0¼ | 0 6 0 | 0 6 5½ | | M. Goldwin | 0 6 3½ | 0 6 6¾ | 0 6 5 | 0 5 4½ | | E. Ainyouns | 0 6 5½ | 0 6 0 | 0 5 3 | 0 4 1 | | M. Newnham | 0 6 0 | 0 6 1½ | 0 6 0 | 0 5 8 | | M. Rodgers | 0 7 0 | 0 6 10½ | 0 7 0 | 0 6 0½ | | C. Greentree | 0 7 0½ | 0 7 0 | 0 7 5 | 0 4 11 | | J. Greenaway | 0 7 5¾ | 0 8 6 | 0 7 0 | 0 3 11 | | E. Carrington | 0 7 1½ | 0 7 7¼ | 0 7 6 | 0 5 11½ | | S. Greenaway | 0 6 2½ | 0 6 1½ | 0 6 6 | 0 4 3 | | M. Key | 0 7 6 | 0 7 0 | 0 5 2 | 0 5 9¼ | | S. Williams | 0 8 4 | 0 5 1½ | 0 7 1 | 0 6 0¼ | +---------------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ | | £18 1 10¾ | £17 18 9½ | £17 19 11¼ | £14 4 2¼ | +---------------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ These tables are also valuable on account of the light they throw upon the organisation of the bookbinding trade in the middle of last century. It will be seen for instance that the week indicated by "October 11" in Table I was a specially busy week, and that in consequence the payments made to the home workers were much above those made for September 6th or 13th. Under September 6th, twenty-eight home workers were engaged, and next week thirty-nine, but under October 11th the number had risen to fifty-seven. It is also worthy of note that E. Such was an indoor worker under October 11th, but a home worker during the other two weeks, whilst M. A. Joyce worked at home in the third week, but in the workshop during the other two. This condition of disorganisation has now fortunately almost disappeared from the trade. It should also be noted that slight errors of a few farthings in the additions have crept into the totals of some of the columns, but as they do not affect the accuracy of the wage figures the Appendix has been copied exactly as it was published. APPENDIX VII.--TABLE FROM CENSUS, 1901