Women of History: Selected from the Writings of Standard AuthorsVarious
History
Women of History: Selected from the Writings of Standard Authors
Various
Women -- Biography
Her mind was a proper companion for such a form. She did not endeavour
to shine in conversation by those sprightly sallies which only puzzle,
and, with still greater care, she avoided that affected solemnity in her
discourse which produces stupidity; but, without any eagerness to talk,
she just said what she ought and no more. She had an admirable
discernment in distinguishing between solid and false wit; and, far from
making an ostentatious display of her abilities, she was reserved,
though very just, in her decisions. Her sentiments were always noble,
and even lofty to the highest extent, when there was occasion;
nevertheless, she was less prepossessed with her own merit than is
usually the case with those who have so much. Formed as we have
described, she could not fail of commanding love; but so far was she
from courting it, that she was scrupulously nice with respect to those
whose merit might enable them to cherish any pretensions to her.
[Such a portrait (says Mr Davenport Adams) makes one in love with the
woman it professes to represent, and envy might be tempted to conclude
that it was rather the ideal of some poetic Diana, than a transcript of
a veritable flesh and blood beauty. Undoubtedly, the natural partiality
of the brother and the pride of the husband (Count de Grammont), whose
united skill has been exerted to produce so agreeable an _ensemble_,
have filled in the outline with too flattering colours, and heightened
the charms of nature by the graces of art. But when, for this fond
exaggeration, due allowance shall have been made, there will still
remain enough to justify us in regarding Elizabeth Hamilton as one of
the most fascinating women of her age or nation.
The highest in rank, and the most important of her lovers, was the Duke
of York, who had been captivated by a glance at her portrait in Lely's
studio. His proposals, however, being neither flattering nor honourable,
were haughtily rejected. The Duke of Richmond, a gamester and a
drunkard; the heir of Norfolk, a wealthy simpleton; the brave and
handsome Falmouth, who afterwards died a hero's death in one of the
great sea-fights with the Dutch; the two Russels, uncle and nephew; and
the invincible Henry Jermyn, in succession acknowledged the power of her
charms, and offered her their hands. They were refused. The Count de
Grammont next presented himself, and was more successful, though in
moral character he was not superior to his predecessors, and in fortune
was their inferior.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account