Ireland -- History -- Rebellion of 1798; Women -- Ireland -- Biography
In 1795 he took the oath of the _United Irishmen_ under very sensational
circumstances, thus detailed by Madden: “A case occurred before Prime
Serjeant Fitzgerald, in which a conviction was obtained on a charge of
administering the United Irishmen’s oath, then a capital offence. Emmet
appeared for the prisoners on a motion in arrest of judgment. He took up
the pleadings in which the words of the oath were recited, and he read
them in a very deliberate manner, and with all the gravity of a man who
felt that he was binding his soul by the obligations of a solemn oath.
‘I, Thomas Addis Emmet, in the presence of God, do pledge myself to my
country that I will use all my abilities and influence in the attainment
of an impartial and adequate representation of the Irish nation in
parliament; and as a means and absolute and immediate necessity in the
establishment of this chief good of Ireland, I will endeavour, as much
as lies in my ability, to forward a brotherhood of affection, an
identity of interests, a communion of rights and an union of power,
among Irishmen of all religious persuasions, without which, every reform
in parliament must be partial, not national, inadequate to the wants,
delusive to the wishes, and insufficient to the freedom and happiness of
this country.’
“Having read the text, and defended its obligations with a power of
reasoning and a display of legal knowledge, in reference to the subject
of the distinction between legal and illegal oaths, which the counsel
for the prosecution described as producing an extraordinary impression,
he said:
“‘My lords, here in the presence of this legal court, this crowded
auditory, in the presence of the Being that sees, and witnesses, and
directs this judicial tribunal—here, my lords, I, myself, in the
presence of God, declare I take the oath.’ He then took the book, kissed
it, and sat down. No steps were taken by the court against the
newly-sworn United Irishman; the amazement of its functionaries left
them in no fit state of mind either for remonstrance or reproval. The
prisoners received a very lenient sentence.”
Though Emmet took the oath thus publicly, he was not publicly identified
with the United Irishmen until a period considerably later. He was
rarely engaged as their counsel in the trials of 1797 and 1798—acting
rather as chamber lawyer to their committees. He became a member of the
directory in 1797 after the arrest of Arthur O’Connor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account