The user of the key must, however, realize that external appearance,
such, for example, as color, is not only very variable but also very
difficult to describe, individual observers differing especially in
seeing and describing shades of color. The same is true of statements
of size, when relative, and not accurately measured, while weight and
hardness can perhaps be more readily approximated. Whether any feature
is distinctly or only indistinctly seen will also depend somewhat
on individual eyesight, opinion, or practice. In some cases the
resemblance of different species is so close that only one other
expedient will make distinction possible, namely, a knowledge of the
region from which the wood has come. We know, for instance, that no
longleaf pine grows in Arkansas and that no white pine can come from
Alabama, and we can separate the white cedar, giant arbor vitæ of the
West and the arbor vitæ of the Northeast, only by the difference of
the locality from which the specimen comes. With all these limitations
properly appreciated, the key will be found helpful toward greater
familiarity with the woods which are more commonly met with.
The features which have been utilized in the key and with which--their
names as well as their appearance--therefore, the reader must
familiarize himself before attempting to use the key, are mostly
described as they appear in cross-section. They are:
(1) Sap-wood and heart-wood (see p. 17), the former being the wood
from the outer and the latter from the inner part of the tree. In some
cases they differ only in shade, and in others in kind of color, the
heart-wood exhibiting either a darker shade or a pronounced color.
Since one can not always have the two together, or be certain whether
he has sap-wood or heart-wood, reliance upon this feature is, to
be sure, unsatisfactory, yet sometimes it is the only general
characteristic that can be relied upon. If further assurance is
desired, microscopic structure must be examined; in such cases
reference has been made to the presence or absence of tracheids in
pith rays and the structure of their walls, especially projections and
spirals.
(2) Annual rings, their formation having been described on page 19.
(See also Figs. 128-130.) They are more or less distinctly marked,
and by such marking a classification of three great groups of wood is
possible.
(3) Spring wood and summer wood, the former being the interior (first
formed wood of the year), the latter the exterior (last formed) part
of the ring. The proportion of each and the manner in which the one
merges into the other are sometimes used, but more frequently the
manner in which the pores appear distributed in either.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account