Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
His manner of speaking, when he had the purpose to make himself
distinctly understood, was energetic and forcible, though neither
graceful nor eloquent. No man could on such occasion put his meaning
into fewer and more decisive words. But when, as it often happened, he
had a mind to play the orator, for the benefit of people’s ears,
without enlightening their understanding, Cromwell was wont to invest
his meaning, or that which seemed to be his meaning, in such a mist of
words, surrounding it with so many exclusions and exceptions, and
fortifying it with such a labyrinth of parentheses, that though one of
the most shrewd men in England, he was, perhaps, the most
unintelligible speaker that ever perplexed an audience. It has been
long since said by the historian, that a collection of the Protector’s
speeches would make, with a few exceptions, the most nonsensical book
in the world; but he ought to have added, that nothing could be more
nervous, concise, and intelligible, than what he really intended should
be understood.
It was also remarked of Cromwell, that though born of a good family,
both by father and mother, and although he had the usual opportunities
of education and breeding connected with such an advantage, the fanatic
democratic ruler could never acquire, or else disdained to practise,
the courtesies usually exercised among the higher classes in their
intercourse with each other. His demeanour was so blunt as sometimes
might be termed clownish, yet there was in his language and manner a
force and energy corresponding to his character, which impressed awe,
if it did not impose respect; and there were even times when that dark
and subtle spirit expanded itself, so as almost to conciliate
affection. The turn for humour, which displayed itself by fits, was
broad, and of a low, and sometimes practical character. Something there
was in his disposition congenial to that of his countrymen; a contempt
of folly, a hatred of affectation, and a dislike of ceremony, which,
joined to the strong intrinsic qualities of sense and courage, made him
in many respects not an unfit representative of the democracy of
England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account