Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
“Why,” replied the young Scot, “by the surer side of the house, and
after the old fashion, if D’Avenant speaks truth. It seems that his
mother was a good-looking, laughing, buxom mistress of an inn between
Stratford and London, at which Will Shakspeare often quartered as he
went down to his native town; and that out of friendship and gossipred,
as we say in Scotland, Will Shakspeare became godfather to Will
D’Avenant; and not contented with this spiritual affinity, the younger
Will is for establishing some claim to a natural one, alleging that his
mother was a great admirer of wit, and there were no bounds to her
complaisance for men of genius.”
“Out upon the hound!” said Colonel Everard; “would he purchase the
reputation of descending from poet, or from prince, at the expense of
his mother’s good fame?—his nose ought to be slit.”
“That would be difficult,” answered the disguised Prince, recollecting
the peculiarity of the bard’s countenance.[1]
[1] D’Avenant actually wanted the nose, the foundation of many a jest
of the day.
“Will D’Avenant the son of Will Shakspeare?” said the knight, who had
not yet recovered his surprise at the enormity of the pretension; “why,
it reminds me of a verse in the Puppet-show of Phaeton, where the hero
complains to his mother—
‘Besides, by all the village boys I am sham’d,
You the Sun’s son, you rascal, you be d—d!’
“I never heard such unblushing assurance in my life!—Will D’Avenant the
son of the brightest and best poet that ever was, is, or will be?—But I
crave your pardon, nephew—You, I believe, love no stage plays.”
“Nay, I am not altogether so precise as you would make me, uncle. I
have loved them perhaps too well in my time, and now I condemn them not
altogether, or in gross, though I approve not their excesses and
extravagances.—I cannot, even in Shakspeare, but see many things both
scandalous to decency and prejudicial to good manners—many things which
tend to ridicule virtue, or to recommend vice,—at least to mitigate the
hideousness of its features. I cannot think these fine poems are an
useful study, and especially for the youth of either sex, in which
bloodshed is pointed out as the chief occupation of the men, and
intrigue as the sole employment of the women.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account