Worcestershire in the Nineteenth Century: A Complete Digest of Facts Occuring in the County since the Commencement of the year 1800Turberville, T. C.
History
Worcestershire in the Nineteenth Century: A Complete Digest of Facts Occuring in the County since the Commencement of the year 1800
Turberville, T. C.
Worcester (England) -- History
immediately ordered the military to clear the streets, which they did in
a very short time. A great number of stones were thrown at them; but the
resistance speedily ceased, and many parties were again taken into
custody and conveyed to the gaol. Several of the mob were cut, though
not seriously, by the sabres of the military. A detachment of the 91st
Infantry arrived from Pershore about three a.m., but their services were
not then required. The city, for two or three nights afterwards, wore an
unquiet aspect, and desultory mobs were collected, but no further harm
was done. The magistrates examined the prisoners afterwards—amounting,
in all, to about thirty persons. Most of them were liberated on entering
into their own recognizances to keep the peace, and a few of the worst
were fined or sent to the treadmill.
LOCAL ACTS—For erecting a County Hall and Courts of Assize at Worcester;
for better repairing the road from Bromsgrove to Birmingham.
1832.
THE ministers, calling Parliament together again almost immediately,
proposed another Reform Bill, differing from the former one in the
apportionment of boroughs in the schedules, in preserving the rights of
freemen by birth and servitude, and in giving freeholders in boroughs the
right to vote in county elections. The second reading was carried, on
the morning of Sunday, the 18th of December, 1851, by a majority of 324
to 162; the majority being thus much larger than before. The bill passed
a second reading in the Lords by a majority of 9; seventeen peers who
voted against the bill in 1831 voted for it in 1832, and others absented
themselves. Immediately on going into committee, however, Lord Lyndhurst
proposed to postpone the disenfranchising to the enfranchising clauses,
and this was carried against ministers by a majority of 35. Earl Grey
then applied to the King for powers to carry the bill as it stood; and,
on the King’s refusing a _carte blanche_ for the creation of peers,
ministers resigned _en masse_. Lord Lyndhurst was sent for by the King;
but the Commons pledged themselves, by an overwhelming majority, to
support only the former ministers, and, in the face of such a resolution,
no ministry could be formed. Then came the thunders of the _Times_,
declaring that “the Queen had done it all,” the threatened run upon the
Bank, and symptoms of disaffection among the soldiery. At last the King
found himself obliged to put into Earl Grey’s hands all the powers he
required, and he returned to office on the 15th of April. The opposition
peers then, at the King’s request, absented themselves from the House,
and the bill passed with little further discussion. It received the
royal assent on the 7th of June. Parliament was soon afterwards
dissolved; and the new constituencies, of course, returned a very large
preponderance of Whig or Reform members. Three per Cents. averaged 83½;
wheat averaged 58s. 8d.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account