Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
Footnote 342:
_Records of Worshipful Company of Carpenters_, Vol. III., p. 15,
_Court Book_.
Footnote 343:
_Ibid._ Vol. III., p. 30.
Footnote 344:
_Ibid._ Vol. III., p. 31.
On her husband’s death the carpenter’s wife generally retired from
business, transferring her apprentices for a consideration to another
master. That this practice was not universal is shown in the case of a
boy who had been apprenticed to Joseph Hutchinson and was “turned over
to Anne Hayward, widow, relict of Richard Hayward Carpentar.”[345] Mrs.
Hayward must clearly have been actively prosecuting her late husband’s
business. The women who “make free” apprentices seem generally to have
done so within a few months of their husband’s deaths. That the Company
recognised the right of women to retain apprentices if they chose is
shown by the following provision in Statutes dated November 10th, 1607.
“If any Apprentice or Apprentices Marry or Absent themselves from their
Master or Mistress During their Apprenticehood, then within one month
the Master or Mistress is to Bring their Indentures to the hall to be
Registered and Entered, etc.” “None to Receive or take into their
service or house any Man or Woman’s Apprentice Covenant Servant or
Journeyman within the limits aforesaid, etc.”[346]
Footnote 345:
_Ibid._ Vol. I., p. 136.
Footnote 346:
_Records of the Worshipful Company of Carpenters_, Vol. I., Intro.
vii-viii.
When a carpenter’s widow could keep her husband’s business together, no
one disputed her right to receive apprentices. Several instances of
their doing so are recorded towards the end of the century.[347] The
right to succeed her husband in his position as carpenter and member of
the worshipful company was immediately allowed when claimed by a widow;
thus the court “agreed ... that Johan burton wydowe late wife of [ ]
burton citezein and Carpenter of London for that warninge hathe not ben
goven unto her from tyme to tyme at the Quarterdaies heretofore From
henseforthe shall have due warninge goven unto her everye Quarterdaye
and at the next Quarterdaie she shall paye in discharge of tharrerages
behind Twelve pence & so shall paye her Quateridge (pᵈ xijid.)”[348]; a
year later “burtons widow” makes free an apprentice Mighell
Pattinson.[349]
Footnote 347:
_Ibid._ p. 137, May 2, 1671. Richardus Read filius Thome Read de Chart
Magna in Com. Kanc. Shoemaker po: se appren Josepho Hutchinson Bedello
Hujus Societat pro Septem Ann a die dat Indre Dat die et ann ult pred
(Assign immediate Susanne Catlin vid nuper uxor. Johannis Catlin nuper
Civis et Carpenter London defunct uten etc).
_Ibid._ p. 153. Dec. 5, 1676. Johannes Keyes filius Willi. Keyes nuper
de Hampsted in Com. Middx. Milwright ed Elizabetham Davis vid. willi
Davis nuper Civi & Carpentar de London a die date pred etc (sic).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account