Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
_The Law._—It must be remembered that the mass of the “common people”
were little affected by “the law” before the seventeenth century.
“Common law” was the law of the nobles,[547] while farming people and
artizans alike were chiefly regulated in their dealings with each other
by customs depending for interpretation and sanction upon a public
opinion which represented women as well as men. Therefore the changes
which during the seventeenth century were abrogating customs in favour
of common law, did in effect eliminate women from what was equivalent to
a share in the custody and interpretation of law, which henceforward
remained exclusively in the hands of men. The result of the elimination
of the feminine influence is plainly shown in a succession of laws,
which, in order to secure complete liberty to individual men, destroyed
the collective idea of the family, and deprived married women and
children of the property rights which customs had hitherto secured to
them. From this time also the administration of the law becomes
increasingly perfunctory in enforcing the fulfilment of men’s
responsibilities to their wives and children.
Footnote 547:
_Holdsworth_, Vol. III., p. 408.
_Church_.—According to modern ideas, religion pertains more to women
than to men, but this conception is new, dating from the scientific era.
Science has solved so many of the problems which in former days
threatened the existence of mankind, that the “man in the street”
instinctively relegates religion to the region in which visible beauty,
poetry and music are still permitted to linger; to the ornamental sphere
in short, whither the Victorian gentleman also banished his wife and
daughters. This attitude forms a singular contrast to the ideas which
prevailed in the Middle Ages, when men believed that supernatural
assistance was their sole protection against the “pestilence that
walketh in darkness” or from “the arrow that flieth by day.” Religion
was then held to be such an awful power that there were men who even
questioned whether women could, properly speaking, be considered
religious at all. Even in the seventeenth century the practice of
religion and the holding of correct ideas concerning it were deemed to
be essential for the maintenance of human existence, and no suggestion
was then made that religious observances could be adequately performed
by women alone.
Ideas as to the respective appropriateness of religious power to men and
women have differed widely; some races have reserved the priesthood for
men, while others have recognised a special power enduing women; in the
history of others again no uniform tendency is shown, but the two
influences can be traced acting and reacting upon each other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account