Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
Clearly in a profession which often holds in its hands the balance
between life and death, those members who are debarred from systematic
study and training must inevitably give way sooner or later to those who
have access to all the sources of learning, but the influences which
were prejudicing women’s position in midwifery during the seventeenth
century were not wholly founded on such reasonable grounds; they were
also affected by much more general, undefined and subtle causes. It may
even be doubted whether the superior knowledge of the seventeenth
century doctor actually secured a larger measure of safety to the mother
who entrusted herself to his management than was attained by those who
confided in the skill of an experienced and intelligent midwife.
Chamberlain admits that the practice of doctors “not onely in England
but throughout Europe; ... hath very much caused the report, that where
a man comes, one or both [mother or child] must necessarily dye; and
makes many for that reason forbear sending, untill either be dead or
dying.”[652] He continues “my Father, Brothers and myself (though none
else in Europe that I know) have by God’s blessing, and our industry,
attained to, and long practised a way to deliver a woman in this case
without any prejudice to her or her Infant.”
Footnote 652:
Chamberlain (Hugh). _Accomplisht Midwife: Epistle to Reader._
The discovery to which Chamberlain refers was the use of forceps, which
he and his family retained as a profound secret. Therefore this
invention did not rank among the advantages which other doctors
possessed over midwives at this period. Even when, a century later, the
use of forceps became generally understood, the death rate in childbed
was not materially reduced, for it was only with the discovery of the
value of asepsis that this heavy sacrifice was diminished. We must
therefore look for the explanation of the growing ascendancy of male
practitioners to other causes beside the hypothetical standard of their
greater efficiency. Their prestige rested partly on an ability to use
long words which convinced patients of their superior wisdom; it was
defended by what was fast becoming a powerful corporation; and more
potent in its effect was the general deterioration in the position of
women which took place during the century. A lessening of confidence in
womanly resourcefulness and capacity in other walks of life, could not
fail to affect popular estimation of their value here too; and added to
this were the morbid tendencies of the increasing numbers of oversexed
society women who were devoted to a life of pleasure. The fact that
similar tendencies were visible in France, where an excellent scientific
training was open to women, shows that the capture of the profession by
men was not only due to superior skill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account