Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
“The young weaver just out of his apprenticeship is perhaps as well
able to earn as he will be at any future period setting aside the
domestic comforts incidental to the married state, his pecuniary
condition is in the first instance improved by uniting himself with a
woman capable of earning perhaps nearly as much as himself, and
performing for him various offices involving an actual pecuniary
saving. A married man with an income, the result of the earnings of
himself and wife of 20s. will enjoy more substantial comfort in every
way than he alone would enjoy with an income of 15s. a week. This
alone is an inducement to early marriage. In obedience to this primary
inducement the weaver almost invariably marries soon after he is out
of his apprenticeship. But the improvement of comfort which marriage
brings is of short duration;.... About the tenth year the labour of
the eldest child becomes available.... Many men have depended on their
wives & their children to support themselves by their own earnings,
independent of his wages. The wives and children consequently took to
the loom, or sought work in the factories; and now that there is
little or no work in the district, the evil is felt, and the husband
is obliged to maintain them out of his wages.”
Footnote 204:
_Hist. MSS. Com. Var. Coll._, Vol. I., p. 135, _Wilts. Q.S. Rec._,
1657.
It was not however the uncertain part they played in the processes of
weaving, burling or carding, which constituted the importance of the
woollen trade in regard to women’s industrial position. Their employment
in these directions was insignificant compared with the unceasing and
never satisfied demand which the production of yarn made upon their
labour. It is impossible to give any estimate of the quantity of wool
spun for domestic purposes. That this was considerable is shown by a
recommendation from the Commission appointed to enquire into the decay
of the Cloth Trade in 1622, who advise “that huswyves may not make cloth
to sell agayne, but for the provision of themselves and their famylie
that the clothiers and Drapers be not dis-coraged.”[205]
Footnote 205:
_Report of Commission of Decay of Clothing Trade_, 1622, Stowe, 554,
fo. 48b.
The housewife span both wool and flax for domestic use, but this aspect
of her industry will be considered more fully in connection with the
linen trade, attention here being concentrated on the condition of the
spinsters in the woollen trade. Their organization varied widely in
different parts of the country. Sometimes the spinster bought the wool,
span it, and then sold the yarn, thus securing all the profit of the
transaction for herself. In other cases she was supplied with the wool
by the clothier, or a “market spinner” and only received piece wages for
her labour. The system in vogue was partly decided by the custom of the
locality, but there was everywhere a tendency to substitute the latter
for the former method.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account