World's End: A Story in Three BooksJefferies, Richard
General
World's End: A Story in Three Books
Jefferies, Richard
England -- Fiction; Inheritance and succession -- Fiction; Murder -- Fiction
“Therefore,” wrote Aurelian, “the first thing is money, and I wish my
property to be used freely for this end, convinced that you will do
Theodore full justice; and I bid you, if possible, to take the
_weapons_ of the companies out of their hands. Without the claimants
they are powerless.”
These papers, and the facts and reflections they contained, made the
deepest impression upon Marese and Theodore. In secret they walked
through the city of Stirmingham, and marked its wealth, its vastness,
its trade and population.
“And nearly all this is mine,” whispered Marese, pale as death in his
subdued excitement. He had to hold Theodore’s arm to sustain his body,
for, strong as he was, he trembled.
Next day they left for London, for Marese could not bear the
Tantalus-like view of the wealth which was and was not his. In London
they thought and planned as only such men seeking such an end can think
and plan.
Chapter Eleven.
While Marese and Theodore are maturing their plans, it will conduce to
the easier comprehension of the horrible, complicated events which
followed, if the past history of the estate be briefly summed up in
such a manner that this chapter can be used for reference.
In the commencement, nearly a century previous to the present time, we
have seen old Sibbold, the morose miser, gloating over his money, and
studying his title-deeds. These gave him an unquestioned right to the
farm he occupied, and to the Swamp, or waste land, which had been
squatted on by Will Baskette and his companions. This right mainly
depended, though not entirely, upon a certain deed of entail. Without
that deed Sibbold had still sufficient evidence to prove his right to
his farm, but not to the Swamp; without that deed there was no fixed
succession—that is to say, he could have devised it to any one he
chose.
There was, therefore, just the possibility that, hating his eldest son
Arthur, he had himself destroyed this deed, in order to prepare the way
for his second son, James. But against this supposition there was the
known character of the man, which led one to imagine that he would
rather have died than give up the smallest fraction of his possessions.
At all events, this deed was missing, as were several others of little
or no value, such as expired leases of fields to tenants, which had
once been kept in Sibbold’s oaken press, under padlock and key.
When Sibbold met with his death at the hands of highwaymen, the farm
and waste lands, in the natural course of things, would have passed to
his eldest son, Arthur, but he having disappeared, and not appearing to
make a claim, James Sibbold, the younger son, took the property. The
majority of people always thought, from the fact of Arthur’s not
returning to claim his birthright, that he had had a hand in the
slaughter of old Will Baskette, and that his conscience drove him away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account