Short stories, American; United States -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
But it was all true; every word. I glanced back at our squadron, lying
in its usual semicircle, every nose pointing at the mouth of the
harbour. It would have been absurd to think that anything had happened.
The squadron hadn't changed a button. There it sat without even a smile
on the face of the tiger. And it had eaten four armoured cruisers and
two torpedo-boat-destroyers while my back was turned for a moment.
Courteously, but clearly, we announced across the waters that until
despatch-boats came to be manned from the ranks of the celebrated
horse-marines, the lieutenant's statement would probably remain
unappreciated. He made a gesture, abandoning us to our scepticism. It
infuriates an honourable and serious man to be taken for a liar or a
joker at a time when he is supremely honourable and serious. However,
when we went ashore, we found Siboney ringing with the news. It was
true, then; that mishandled collection of sick ships had come out and
taken the deadly thrashing which was rightfully the due of--I don't
know--somebody in Spain--or perhaps nobody anywhere. One likes to
wallop incapacity, but one has mingled emotions over the incapacity
which is not so much personal as it is the development of centuries.
This kind of incapacity cannot be centralised. You cannot hit the head
which contains it all. This is the idea, I imagine, which moved the
officers and men of our fleet. Almost immediately they began to speak
of the Spanish Admiral as "poor old boy" with a lucid suggestion in
their tones that his fate appealed to them as being undue hard, undue
cruel. And yet the Spanish guns hit nothing. If a man shoots, he should
hit something occasionally, and men say that from the time the Spanish
ships broke clear of the harbour entrance until they were one by one
overpowered, they were each a band of flame. Well, one can only mumble
out that when a man shoots he should be required to hit something
occasionally.
In truth, the greatest fact of the whole campaign on land and sea seems
to be the fact that the Spaniards could only hit by chance, by a fluke.
If he had been an able marksman, no man of our two unsupported
divisions would have set foot on San Juan hill on July 1. They should
have been blown to smithereens. The Spaniards had no immediate lack of
ammunition, for they fired enough to kill the population of four big
cities. I admit neither Velasquez nor Cervantes into this discussion,
although they have appeared by authority as reasons for something which
I do not clearly understand. Well, anyhow they couldn't hit anything.
Velasquez? Yes. Cervantes? Yes. But the Spanish troops seemed only to
try to make a very rapid fire. Thus we lost many men. We lost them
because of the simple fury of the fire; never because the fire was
well-directed, intelligent. But the Americans were called upon to be
whipped because of Cervantes and Velasquez. It was impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account