Writings in Connection with the Donatist ControversyAugustine, of Hippo, Saint
ReligionChristian
Writings in Connection with the Donatist Controversy
Augustine, of Hippo, Saint
Donatists; Donatists -- Controversial literature
CHAP. XXIX.--31. These things, brethren, I would have you retain as the
basis of your action and preaching with untiring gentleness: love men,
while you destroy errors; take of the truth without pride; strive for
the truth without cruelty. Pray for those whom you refute and convince
of error. For the prophet prays to God for mercy upon such as these,
saying, "Fill their faces with shame, that they may seek Thy name, O
Lord."[682] And this, indeed, the Lord has done already, so as to fill
the faces of the followers of Maximianus with shame in the sight of all
mankind: it only remains that they should learn how to blush to their
soul's health. For so they will be able to seek the name of the Lord,
from which they are turned away to their utter destruction, whilst they
exalt their own name in the place of that of Christ. May ye live and
persevere in Christ, and be multiplied, and abound in the love of God,
and in love towards one another, and towards all men, brethren well
beloved.
FOOTNOTES:
[639] Ps. cxx. 7.
[640] Ps. cxviii. 8.
[641] Jer. xvii. 5.
[642] Ps. iii. 8.
[643] Ps. lx. 11.
[644] 1 Cor. i. 13.
[645] Rom. iv. 5.
[646] 1 Cor. iii. 6, 7.
[647] John xv. 5.
[648] Rom. xii. 5.
[649] Matt. xxiii. 3.
[650] Rom. iv. 25, 5.
[651] Matt. vii. 17, 16.
[652] Matt. xii. 35.
[653] See below, Book II. vi. 12.
[654] So the Donatists commonly quoted Ecclus. xxxiv. 25, which is
more correctly rendered in our version, "He that washeth himself after
the touching of a dead body, if he touch it again, what availeth
his washing?" Augustine (_Retract._ i. 21, sec. 3) says that the
misapplication was rendered possible by the omission in many African
Mss. of the second clause, "and touches it again."
[655] Rom. vi. 9.
[656] John i. 33.
[657] Cp. _Contra Cresconium_, Book II. xxv. 30: "Ita mortui sunt, ut
neque super terras, neque in requie sanctorum sint."
[658] Migne suggests as an emendation, "quod Deus illi comes erat," as
in II. xxiii. 53, xxxvii. 87, etc.
[659] 1 Sam. xvii. 51.
[660] That of Bagai. See on _de Bapt._ I. v. 7.
[661] Ore latissimo acclamaverunt. The Louvain edition has "lætissimo,"
both here and _Contra Crescon._ IV. xli. 48.
[662] Num. xvi. 31-35.
[663] Ps. lxxii. 8.
[664] Ps. ii. 8.
[665] Qui talia facientes quamvis improbent. A comparison of the
explanation of this passage in _Contra Crescon._ III. xli. 45, shows
the probability of Migne's conjecture, "quamvis improbe," "who endure
the men that act in such a way, however monstrous their conduct may be."
[666] Nec in se agnoscunt. The reading of the Louvain edition gives
better sense, "Et in se agnoscunt," "and discover in themselves."
[667] Matt. xxiii. 34.
[668] Isa. lviii. 1.
[669] Ps. lxiii. 11.
[670] Ps. xiv. 5-7, from the LXX. only.
[671] Matt. vii. 15.
[672] Matt. vii. 16.
[673] "Obmutescatis" is the most probable conjecture of Migne for
"obtumescatis," which could only mean, "you should swell with
confusion."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account