Detective and mystery stories; Inheritance and succession -- Fiction; Missing persons -- Fiction
'It is Mark Wylder's writing--I'll swear to it. What on earth _can_ he
mean? He can't possibly want to confuse us upon dates, as well as places,
because that would simply render his letters, for purposes of business,
nugatory, and there are many things he wishes attended to.'
Jos. Larkin rose from his desk, ruminating, and went to the window, and
placed the letter against the pane. I don't think he had any definite
motive in doing this, but something struck him that he had not remarked
before.
There was something different in the quality of the ink that wrote the
number of the date, 28th, from that used in the rest of the letter.
'What can that mean?' muttered Larkin, with a sort of gasp at his
discovery; and shading his eyes with his hand, he scrutinised the
numerals--'28th,' again;--'a totally different ink!
He took the previous letter, frowned on it fiercely from his rat-like
eyes, and then with an ejaculation, as like an oath as so good a man
could utter, he exclaimed,
'I have it!'
Then came a pause, and he said--
'Both alike!--blanks left when the letters were written, and the dates
filled in afterward--_not_ the same hand I _think_--no, _not_ the
same--_positively_ a different hand.'
Then Jos. Larkin examined these mysterious epistles once more.
'There may be something in what Larcom said--a very great deal, possibly.
If he was shut up somewhere they could make him write a set of these
letters off at a sitting, and send them from place to place to be posted,
to make us think he was travelling, and prevent our finding where they
keep him. Here it is plain there was a slip in posting the wrong one
first.'
Trepanned, kidnapped, hid away in the crypts of some remote
mad-house--reduced to submission by privation and misery--a case as
desperate as that of a prisoner in the Inquisition. What could be the
motive for this elaborate and hideous fraud? Would it not be a more
convenient course, as well as more merciful to put him to death? The
crime would hardly be greater. Why should he be retained in that ghastly
existence?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account