Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich MercuryPalmer, Frederick Danby
History
Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich Mercury
Palmer, Frederick Danby
Great Yarmouth (England) -- History
Messrs. William H. Palmer and E. P. Youell had been elected by the
pew-holders, Churchwardens of St. Mary’s, Southtown; and Mr. F. R. King
(vice F. S. Costerton resigned) and Mr. William Hammond had been
appointed to similar office at Gorleston.
At the Yarmouth Vestry (the Rev. G. Hills presiding), Mr. R. Hammond
proposed, and Mr. J. G. Fisher seconded the re-election of Mr. C. D.
Steward, and Mr. B. Fenn proposed, and Mr. F. Worship seconded the
re-election of Mr. E. R. Aldred. The Church Rate was then 2½d. in the £.
At this meeting Messrs. R. Hammond and J. Davey were re-elected
“auditors” for the ensuing year.
April 24th.—It was said that Lord A. Lennox was ready “to start” for
Yarmouth. Meanwhile Sir E. H. K. Lacon was canvassing the electors,
accompanied by about 30 leading Conservatives, and Mr. Rumbold M.P. was
taking a similar course in company with six or seven personal friends,
while Sir C. Napier and Mr. McCullagh, M.P., were addressing crowded
meetings of electors in the several Wards of the Borough.
At the Council Meeting, Mr. C. C. Aldred had publicly apologised for
stating as regarded Mr. F. S. Costerton “that a constituency had been
defeated by the advice of a petty-fogging lawyer.”
The election of an Alderman was then proceeded with, when the voting—
For Mr. Yetts 23
,, Mr. Pullyn 23
And the Mayor gave his casting vote in favour of Mr. Pullyn.
Mr. Palmer had obtained a rule in the Queen’s Bench for a new trial in
the case of Bradstreet _v_ Hammond.
May 1st.—Contains much matter reflecting on Mr. Rumbold’s present
position as contrasted with his former one when connected with the
Liberal party. Having completed his canvass, that gentleman had issued a
joint address with Sir E. Lacon, and being seriously indisposed had left
Yarmouth for his country seat.
The Tory Government, which had been in office six weeks, had appointed
Messrs. B. Fenn, T. Brightwen, J. Cherry, R. Steward, C. C. Aldred, and
J. G. Plummer, Magistrates for the Borough.
The Bench previously to this had consisted of Liberals, Messrs. George
Danby-Palmer, R. Hammond, W. Johnson, and J. W. Shelly, and
Conservatives, J. F. Costerton, E. H. L. Preston, William Danby-Palmer,
W. Thurtell, J. C. Smith, William H. Palmer, B. Jay, W. Yetts, J. Fenn,
and W. H. Bessey.
The “Disfranchised Freemen” had held a meeting and adopted a petition to
Parliament, Messrs. Jacob Harvey, Nelson, Royal, and J. Taylor taking
part in the proceedings.
The agents of the Custom House had taken into custody the landlord of the
“Honest Lawyer.”
May 8th.—The coffer-dam at the new Bridge works had “blown up;” on the
following day the old Bridge had been on fire.
The Cricket Club had been re-established.
The Freemen’s Petition had received 972 signatures.
A tradesman in the town had given a dinner to four old people, whose
united ages amounted to 368 years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account