Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich MercuryPalmer, Frederick Danby
History
Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich Mercury
Palmer, Frederick Danby
Great Yarmouth (England) -- History
Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. R. B.
Norman, Burton, and J. Bayly had been elected the members of the Public
Library Committee.
Jan. 17th.—The “Britannia Pier Bill” was projected, and the Wellington
Pier Company had determined not to oppose that undertaking.
The body of a whale, which had been taken at Winterton, was being
exhibited on the Church Plain.
The Rev. W. D. Wade, the new minister of St. Mary’s, Southtown, had,
before leaving Southsea, been presented with a purse of £61.
Jan. 21st.—The “Sisters” had been in collision with one of the stone
piers of the Bridge, which it had considerably damaged.
Feb. 4th.—An Anti-Income Tax meeting had been held at the Town Hall. The
Mayor presided, and the following took part in the proceedings:—Messrs.
George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory,
R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S.
Bradbeer appeared to be the mover in this matter.
The Poor’s Rate was 1s. 6d. for the quarter.
Feb. 18th.—H.M. Line of Battle-ship “Blenheim,” 74, had steamed into the
Roads.
Feb. 21st.—A “Poor’s Rate” meeting had been held at the Masonic Hall.
Mr. W. Livingston presided, and a resolution protesting against the 1s.
6d. quarterly rate was adopted. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal,
R. Bailey, Nichols, and F. Starling spoke on the subject, while the
conduct of the Guardians was defended by Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of the
Board.
Feb. 25th.—A case which excited considerable interest, had been heard at
the County Court, Tolhouse-hall, before the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.)
The plaintiff was Mr. John Cobb, leather merchant, for whom Mr. C. H.
Chamberlin appeared; the defendants were Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and G.
D. Palmer, who were represented by Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The plaintiff
stated that he was a candidate for the office of Councillor for the
Market-ward, in November, 1851, and that he became such at the
solicitation of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer. At the time he
became a candidate he distinctly told them that he would not pay out of
his own pocket more than £10 towards the expenses of the election, and it
was understood that the Liberal party, to which he belonged, would
subscribe the remainder. The evening before the election he received an
estimate of what the expenses were likely to be, and in consequence of
that he at once saw both Mr. Burroughs and Mr. G. D. Palmer. That
estimate, he believed, amounted to about £45, while the subscriptions
altogether amounted to but £42. After some conversation they agreed to
hold him harmless of the amount of the expenses that might exceed the sum
subscribed, and he and Mr. Burroughs then went to the Committee-room of
the North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs said they had made arrangements for
their friend John Cobb winning the Market-ward. The expenses of the
election, which he (the plaintiff) lost, amounted altogether to £58 1s.
7d.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account