Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich MercuryPalmer, Frederick Danby
History
Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich Mercury
Palmer, Frederick Danby
Great Yarmouth (England) -- History
Nov. 7th.—The first general meeting of the Shareholders of the Britannia
Pier Company had been held, the accounts showing £1,365 received, and
£781 12s. 6d expended.
Nov. 11th.—At the Council Meeting, Mr. E. H. L. Preston proposed, and Mr.
Palmer (Deputy-Mayor) seconded, Mr. Francis Worship for the office of
Mayor. Mr. R. Steward then proposed Mr. W. H. Bessey, who declining the
honour, Mr. Steward suggested the name of Mr. Plummer, who also refusing
to serve, the Mayor declared Mr. Worship unanimously elected to the
office.
The Poor’s rate was 1s. 4d. in the £.
Nov. 14th.—Thirty-six gentlemen had attended the dinner given to the
Ex-Mayor at the Town Hall.
Herring was selling at from £12 to £20 a last.
The adjourned Vestry Meeting for the purpose of considering the propriety
of making a Church rate had been held in the Town Hall. There was a
large attendance of ratepayers, who were, of course, presided over by the
minister of the parish. The Committee appointed to consider the value of
the Church property recommended that that which had fallen in, and which
would fall in on the 25th of March next, should be re-let on repairing
leases of 14 years’ duration, at a rental of £76 16s.—Mr. J. H. Harrison,
one of the committee, gave a detailed account of all the Church property,
both of that which fell in in September last, and that which will fall in
during next year and 1859 and 1860. He had no doubt, whatever, that if
the property was properly managed, there would be no necessity for asking
for a Church rate after 1860.—Mr. C. S. D. Steward and Mr. E. R. Aldred,
the Churchwardens, moved and seconded respectively, “That in consequence
of the increased rental of the estate belonging to St. Nicholas’ Church
not being available for the current year, a rate of 1½d in the pound be
now made and assessed.”—Mr. J. H. Harrison thought that St. Peter’s
Church ought not to be included in the rate, and moved as an amendment,
“That St. Peter’s Church having been erected by voluntary contributions,
with an understanding that it should be maintained and supported by its
pew rents, and should in no way become a charge upon the parish, this
Vestry deems it advisable to refuse making a rate until the Churchwardens
do exclude the said Church of St. Peter wholly from their estimate.”—Mr.
J. Lawn seconded the amendment, but the Chairman refused to put it, on
the ground that he could not consistently with his duty do so.—After
considerable discussion, in the course of which the Clerk stated that St.
Peter’s Church could be legally included in the rate, Mr. W. T. Fisher
moved, and Mr. J. Lawn seconded, on the ground that the Church property,
if re-let at its full value, would realize more than sufficient for the
necessary repairs of the Parish Church, and that money, which could
afterwards be repaid out of the surplus, could be borrowed to defray the
expenses for the next two years,—“That this meeting resolves to adjourn
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account