Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich MercuryPalmer, Frederick Danby
History
Yarmouth Notes, 1830-1872. Collated from the File of the Norwich Mercury
Palmer, Frederick Danby
Great Yarmouth (England) -- History
Nov. 18th.—There had been heavy gales from the N.N.W., and a schooner had
been driven through the Britannia Pier.
Nov. 25th.—The nomination for North Norfolk had taken place at Aylsham,
when the Rev. H. Lombe proposed, and Mr. E. H. L. Preston seconded, Sir
E. H. K. Lacon, Bart.; Mr. H. R. Upcher proposed, and Mr. J. W. Shelly
seconded, Mr. Edmond Robert Wodehouse; Mr. E. Fellowes, M.P., proposed,
and Mr. R. Leaman seconded, the Hon. Frederick Walpole; Mr. Bulwer
proposed, and Mr. Richard England seconded, Mr. Robert T. Gurdon; and the
High Sheriff (Lord Ranelagh) having declared the show of hands equally
divided between the candidates, a poll was demanded on behalf of all of
them.
Nov. 28th.—The poll had been declared as under:—
Walpole 2,642
Lacon 2,574
Wodehouse 2,237
Gurdon 2,081
At Yarmouth it was stated that:—
“the proceedings throughout the day in connection with the polling
for this part of the district were characterised by considerable
excitement. The Conservatives from the opening of the poll took a
prominent position, and as hour by hour passed away their majority
steadily increased, until by three o’clock they were, according to
their published returns, nearly 400 ahead. No statement of the poll
was made during the day by the Liberals, but every exertion was made
to reduce the Conservative majority. Cabs and carriages bearing
placards of “Vote for Wodehouse and Gurdon” were dashing about in all
directions, keeping up the excitement; but, despite every effort, the
influence of the local candidate proved too strong to be successfully
resisted, and at four the Conservative declaration of numbers showed
the following result:—
Lacon 948
Walpole 890
Wodehouse 505
Gurdon 469
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account