Young India: An interpretation and a history of the nationalist movement from withinLajpat Rai, Lala
History
Young India: An interpretation and a history of the nationalist movement from within
Lajpat Rai, Lala
India -- Politics and government -- 1765-1947
See Charles Ball’s Indian Mutiny, vol. I, p. 257. “One trip I enjoyed
amazingly; we got on board a steamer with a gun, while the Sikhs and
the fusiliers marched up to the city. We steamed up throwing shots
right and left till we got up to the bad places, when we went on the
shore and peppered away with our guns, my old double-barrel bringing
down several niggers. So thirsty for vengeance I was. We fired the
places right and left and the flames shot up to the heavens as they
spread, fanned by the breeze, showing that the day of vengeance had
fallen on the treacherous villains. Every day we had expeditions to
burn and destroy disaffected villages and we had taken our revenge.
I have been appointed the chief of a commission for the trial of all
natives charged with offences against the Government and persons. Day
by day, we have strung up eight or ten men. We have the power of life
in our hands and, I assure you, we spare not. A very summary trial is
all that takes place. The condemned culprit is placed under a tree,
with a rope around his neck, on the top of a carriage, and when it is
pulled off he swings.”
* * * * *
“In the Punjab, near Ajnala, in a small island, many a Sepoy who
had simply fled away from a regiment which was working under the
reasonable fear of being disarmed and shot by the Government for
suspicion, was hiding himself. Cooper with a loyal body of troops
took them prisoner. The entire number, amounting to two hundred
and eighty-two, were then conveyed by Cooper to Ajnala. Then came
the question what was to be done with them. There was no means of
transporting them to a place where they could be tried formally. On
the other hand, if they were summarily executed, other regiments
and intending rebels might take warning by their fate, and thus,
further bloodshed might be prevented. For these reasons, Cooper,
fully conscious as he was of the enormous responsibility which he
was undertaking, resolved to put them all to death. Next morning,
accordingly, he brought them out in tens and made some Sikhs shoot
them. In this way, two hundred and sixteen perished. But, there still
remained sixty-six others who had been confined in one of the bastions
of the Tahsil. Expecting resistance, Cooper ordered the door to be
opened. But not a sound issued from the room; forty-five of them were
dead bodies lying on the floor. For, unknown to Cooper, the windows
had been closely shut and the wretched prisoners had found in the
bastion a second Black-Hole. The remaining twenty-one were shot, like
their comrades. 1--8--’57. For this splendid assumption of authority,
Cooper was assailed by the hysterical cries of ignorant humanitarians.
But Robert Montgomery unanswerably vindicated his character by proving
that he had saved the Lahore division.”--Holmes’s History of the
Indian Mutiny, p. 363.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account