Zachariah Chandler: An Outline Sketch of His Life and Public Services
History
Zachariah Chandler: An Outline Sketch of His Life and Public Services
Chandler, Zachariah, 1813-1879; United States -- Politics and government
Whatever theoretic or practical objections may be justly made to
the compromise of 1850, there can be no doubt that it was accepted
and ratified by a great majority of the American people, whether
in the North or in the South. They were intent on business--then
remarkably prosperous--on planting, building, trading and getting
gain--and they hailed with general joy the announcement that all
the differences between the diverse "sections" had been adjusted
and settled. The terms of settlement were, to that majority, of
quite subordinate consequence; they wanted peace and prosperity,
and were no wise inclined to cut each other's throats and burn each
other's houses in a quarrel concerning (as they regarded it) only
the _status_ of negroes. The compromise had taken no money from
their pockets; it had imposed upon them no pecuniary burdens; it
had exposed them to no personal and palpable dangers; it had rather
repelled the gaunt spectre of civil war and disunion (habitually
conjured up when slavery had a point to carry), and increased
the facilities for making money, while opening a boundless vista
of national greatness, security and internal harmony. Especially
by the trading class, and the great majority of the dwellers in
seaboard cities, was this view cherished with intense, intolerant
vehemence.... Whatever else the election of 1852 might have meant,
there was no doubt that the popular verdict was against "slavery
agitation" and in favor of maintaining the compromises of 1850....
The finances were healthy and the public credit unimpaired.
Industry and trade were signally prosperous. The tariff had ceased
to be a theme of partisan or sectional strife. The immense yield of
gold in California during the four preceding years had stimulated
enterprise and quickened the energies of labor, and its volume as
yet showed no signs of diminution. And though the Fugitive Slave
law was still denounced, and occasionally resisted by abolitionists
in the free States, while disunionists still plotted in secret and
more openly prepared in Southern commercial conventions (having for
their ostensible object the establishment of a general exchange
of the great Southern staples directly from their own harbors
with the principal European marts, instead of circuitously by way
of New York and other Northern Atlantic ports) there was still a
goodly majority in the South, with a still larger in the North and
Northwest, in favor of maintaining the Union and preserving the
greatest practical measure of cordiality and fraternity between the
free and slave States, substantially on the basis of the compromise
of 1850.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account