Notwithstanding the apparent certainty of these pendulum experiments,
and the supposed exactitude of the conclusions deducible therefrom,
many of the same school of philosophy differed with each other,
remained dissatisfied, and raised very serious objections both to the
value of the experiments themselves, and to the supposed proof which
they furnished of the Earth’s rotation. One writer in the _Times_
newspaper of the period, who signs himself “B. A. C.,” says, “I have
read the accounts of the Parisian experiment as they have appeared in
many of our papers, and must confess that I still remain unconvinced
of the reality of the phenomenon. It appears to me that, except at
the pole where the point of suspension is immovable, no result can
be obtained. In other cases the shifting of the direction of passage
through the lowest point that takes place during an excursion of
the pendulum, from that point in one direction and its return to it
again, will be exactly compensated by the corresponding shifting in
the contrary direction during the pendulum’s excursion on the opposite
side. Take a particular case. Suppose the pendulum in any latitude to
be set oscillating in the meridian plane, and to be started from the
vertical towards the south. It is obvious that the wire by which it
is suspended _does not continue to describe a plane_, but a species
of conoidal surface; that when the pendulum has reached its extreme
point its direction is to the south-west, and that as the tangent plane
to the described surface through the point of suspension necessarily
contains the normal to the Earth at the same point, the pendulum on
its return passes through the same point in the direction north-east.
Now, starting again from this point, we have exactly the circumstances
of the last case, the primary plane being shifted slightly out of the
meridian; when, therefore, the pendulum has reached its extreme point
of excursion the direction of the wire is to the west of this plane,
and when it returns to the vertical the direction of passage through
the lowest point is as much to the west of this plane as it was in the
former case to the west of the meridian plane; but since it is now
moving from north to south instead of from south to north, as in the
former case, its former deviation receives complete compensation, and
the primary plane returns again to the meridian, when the whole process
recurs.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account