The matter may be summarized as follows:--At any time when the sea is
calm and the weather clear, the Light of the Eddystone, which is 89
feet above the foundation on the rock, may be distinctly seen from an
elevation of 5 feet above the water level; according to the Admiralty
directions, it “may be seen 13 nautical (or 15 statute) miles,”[41] or
one mile still farther away than the position of the observers on the
above-named occasion; and yet _on that occasion_, and at a distance of
only 14 statute miles, notwithstanding that it was a very fine autumn
day, and a clear back ground existed, not only was the lantern, which
is 89 feet high, not visible, but the _top of the vane_, which is 100
feet above the foundation was, as stated in the report, “_entirely out
of sight_.”
[41] “Lighthouses of the World,” p. 36.
[Illustration: FIG. 32.]
That vessels and lighthouses are sometimes more distinctly seen than
at others; and that the lower parts of such objects are sooner lost
sight of when the sea is rough than when it is calm, are items in the
experience of seafaring people as common as their knowledge of the
changes in the weather; and prominence is only given here to the above
case because it was verified by persons of different opinions upon the
subject of the Earth’s form, and in the presence of several hundreds
of the most learned and respectable inhabitants of Plymouth and the
neighbourhood. The conclusion which such observations necessitate and
force upon us is, that the law of perspective which is everywhere
visible on land, is _modified_ when observed in connection with objects
upon or near the sea. But _how_ modified? If the water of the ocean
were frozen and at perfect rest, any object upon its surface would be
seen as far as telescopic or magnifying power could be brought to bear
upon it. But because this is not the case--because the water is always
more or less in motion, not only of progression but of fluctuation,
the swells and waves, into which the surface is broken operate to
prevent the line of sight from passing parallel to the horizontal
surface of the water. It has been shown at pages 16 to 20, and also
at 25 to 33, that the surface of the Earth and Sea appears to rise up
to the level, or altitude of the eye; and that at a certain distance
the line of sight and the surface which is parallel to it appear to
converge to a “vanishing point;” which point is “the horizon.” If this
horizon, or vanishing point, were formed by the apparent junction of
two _perfectly stationary_ parallel lines, it could be penetrated by a
telescope of sufficient power to magnify at the distance; but because
upon the sea the surface of the water is _not stationary_, the line of
sight at the vanishing point becomes angular instead of parallel, and
telescopic power is of little avail in restoring objects beyond this
point. The following diagram will render this clear:--The horizontal
line C D E and the line of sight A B are parallel to each other, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account