Feminism in Greek Literature from Homer to Aristotle — Aristotle — John Shaqi
Feminism in Greek Literature from Homer to Aristotle
Aristotle · en
When we come to the young men we are in a brighter world. Euripides is
essentially the poet of youth, and his younger characters are always
lovable. The heroic boy Menœceus and the kind lad Ion are figures drawn
with a tender hand. But soon the shadows of the prison house draw in,
and the slight hardness which is visible even in Ion becomes intensified
in Achilles, and still more in Hippolytus. The older the person, the
less attractive he becomes. Achilles and Hippolytus are very much like
the public school boy of our day; in many spheres of conduct they are
thoroughly reliable: truthful, self-denying and courageous: but they
are cruelly hampered by the influence of an environment which shuts
out the influence of woman at the most impressionable time of a man’s
life. Hippolytus is something of a prig and into his mouth, in the
well-known speech, Euripides puts all the stock invective against women.
The words are not the lad’s own views: he is too young to have had much
experience of women, good or bad: they are literature, the views of other
men expressed in books and unconsciously assimilated by the younger
generation.
Hippolytus is an ascetic and exaggerates: Achilles is a more manly
character. His first impulses are generous, but he does not carry them
into effect, for he is too much under the influence of other people’s
opinion: ‘good form’ is his guide in life. He has moreover, all a young
man’s vanity. ‘Countless girls are setting traps to catch me as husband’
he says; and he is deeply hurt to think that he is not consulted—‘I would
have agreed to her death, if I had been asked, but I was not; so I will
help you.’ This is the best champion that Clytemnestra can find to save
her daughter.
The remaining five characters, men unmarried, but full-grown, are less
interesting. Pentheus is the typical ‘self-pleaser’: wilful, violent and
intolerant. That he happens to be right in his particular case does not
make him more sympathetic nor does it alter the justice of his fate. His
mode of thought is wrong. Savage repression is not the way to deal with
a cause which enlists women as its chief votaries and is kept active by
their enthusiasm. The other pairs, Orestes and Pylades, Eteocles and
Polynices, require little notice. All four have the curse of Cain upon
them: they draw the sword and fall by the sword. They are murderers first
and foremost, and chiefly interesting to the criminologist.