Life and Correspondence of David Hume, Volume 2 — David Hume — John Shaqi
Life and Correspondence of David Hume, Volume 2
David Hume · en
"I consider myself as very much honoured in being thought worthy of an
answer by a person of so much merit; and as I find that the public does
you justice with regard to the ingenuity and good composition of your
piece, I hope you will have no reason to repent engaging with an
antagonist, whom, perhaps, in strictness, you might have ventured to
neglect. I own to you, that I never felt so violent an inclination to
defend myself as at present, when I am thus fairly challenged by you,
and I think I could find something specious at least to urge in my
defence; but as I had fixed a resolution, in the beginning of my life,
always to leave the public to judge between my adversaries and me,
without making any reply, I must adhere inviolably to this resolution,
otherwise my silence on any future occasion would be construed an
inability to answer, and would be matter of triumph against me."[119:1]
He then, in the passage already cited,[119:2] describes the occasion on
which the "Theory of Miracles" was suggested to him.
In answer to this, there is a letter by Campbell, in which he endeavours
to rival his opponent in candour, politeness, and gentlemanlike feeling.
The happy courtesy with which he apologizes for the occasionally
irascible tone of his essay, shows that the retired northern divine
possessed in no small degree the qualities that might have adorned a
more showy station.
DR. CAMPBELL _to_ HUME.
_25th June, 1762._
The testimony you are pleased to give in favour of my
performance, is an honour of which I should be entirely
unworthy, were I not sensible of the uncommon generosity you
have shown in giving it. Ever since I was acquainted with your
works, your talents as a writer have, notwithstanding some
differences in abstract principles, extorted from me the
highest veneration. But I could scarce have thought that, in
spite of differences of a more interesting nature, even such
as regard morals and religion, you could ever force me to love
and honour you as a man. Yet no religious prejudices (as you
would probably term them,) can hinder me from doing justice to
that goodness and candour, which appear in every line of your
letter.