[Footnote 138: Zeno and Cleanthes both accepted the ecpyrosis. See Diog. Laert., _ubi cit._, c. 70. The same author says that Panætius said that the cosmos was imperishable.] [Footnote 139: σῶμα διὰ σώματος μὲν χωρεῖν, _corpusque per corpus migrare_, Cr. Macmahon inserts a “not” in the sentence, but without authority. The Stoic resurrection assumed that in the new world created out of the ashes of the old, individuals would take the same place as in this last. See Arnold, _op. cit._, p. 193 for authorities.] [Footnote 140: ἀτόμοι, “that cannot be cut.” The rest of this sentence is taken from Diog. Laert., X, _vit. Epicur._, c. 24, and is quoted there from Epicurus’ treatise on Nature.] [Footnote 141: With the exception of the Deity’s seat in the intercosmic spaces and the idea that the souls of men consist of blood, all the above opinions of Epicurus are to be found in Diog. Laert., X, _vit. Epic._] [Footnote 142: οὐ μᾶλλον, “not rather.”] [Footnote 143: See n. on p. 49 _supra_. The doctrines here given are those of the Sceptics, and are to be found in Diog. Laert., IX, _vit. Pyrrho_, c. 79 ff. and in Sextus Empiricus, _Hyp. Pyrrho_, I, 209 ff. Diog. Laert. quotes from Ascanius of Abdera that Pyrrho introduced the dogma of incomprehensibility, and Hippolytus seems to have copied this without noticing that he has said the same thing about Xenophanes.] [Footnote 144: Diog. Laert., I, _Prooem._, c. 1, mentions both Gymnosophists and Druids, but if he ever gave any account of their teaching it must be in the part of the book which is lost. Clem. Alex., _Stromateis_, I, c. 15, describes the two classes of Gymnosophists as Sarmanæ and Brachmans. The Sarmanæ or Samanæi (Shamans?) seem the nearer of the two to the Brachmans of our text.] [Footnote 145: ἀκροδρύοι, hard-shelled fruit such as acorns or chestnuts.] [Footnote 146: Roeper suggests the Ganges.] [Footnote 147: Megasthenes, for whom see Strabo V, 712, differs from Hippolytus in making the abstinence of the Gymnosophists endure for thirty-seven years only.] [Footnote 148: Nothing has yet been said about any bank.] [Footnote 149: The whole of this sentence is corrupt. Macmahon following Roeper would read: “This discourse whom they name God they affirm to be incorporeal, but enveloped in a body outside himself, just as if one carried a covering of sheepskin to have it seen; but having stripped off the body in which he is enveloped, he no longer appears visibly to the naked eye.”] [Footnote 150: ἐγείρας τρόπαιον, lit., “raised a trophy.”] [Footnote 151: θεολογοῦσι. Eusebius, _Præp. Ev._, uses the word in this sense. For the Dandamis and Calanus stories, see Arrian, _Anabasis_, Bk. VII, cc. 2, 3.]