Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II
David Hume · en
Turning this into other words, he says that a Man is the All which is
the source of the universals, [being] unbegotten, incorruptible, and
eternal; and that there is a Son of the aforesaid Man, who is begotten,
and capable of suffering, being born in a timeless, unwilled, and
previously undefined way. For such, says he, is the Power of that Man.
And when it was so, the son of the Power came into being more quickly
than reasoning or counsel. And this is, he says, the saying in the
Scriptures: “He was and came into being,”[49] which is: Man was and
his son came into being, as if one were to say: Fire was and Light
came into being in a timeless, unwilled, and previously undefined
way, while being at the same time fire. But this Man is a single
monad, uncompounded [and] undifferentiated, [and yet] compounded [and]
differentiated, loving and at peace with all things, [and yet] fighting
with and at war with all things before him,[50] unlike and like, as
it were a certain musical [Sidenote: p. 410.] harmony which contains
whatever one may say or leave unsaid, showing all things and giving
birth to all things. “This is Father, this is Mother, Two Immortal
names.”[51] But for the sake of an instance, conceive, he says, as the
greatest image of the Perfect Man, the one tittle which is one tittle
uncompounded, simple, a pure monad having no composition whatever from
anything, [yet] compounded of many forms, of many parts. That undivided
One, he says, is the many-faced and myriad-eyed and myriad-named one
tittle of the Iota,[52] which is an image of that Perfect and Invisible
Man.
13. The one tittle, he says, is then the monad and a decad. For by this
power of the one tittle of the Iota [are produced] also [the] dyad
and triad and tetrad and pentad and hexad and heptad and ogdoad and
ennead up to the ten. For these are the diversified numbers dwelling
within that simple and uncompounded tittle of the [Sidenote: p. 411.]
Iota. And this is the saying:--“Because it pleased the whole Pleroma to
dwell within the Son of Man bodily.”[53] For such compounds of numbers
from the simple and uncompounded one tittle of the Iota become he says
bodily hypostases. Therefore, he says, the Son of Man was born from
the Perfect Man, whom none know. But, he says, every creature who is
ignorant of the Son, represents Him as the offspring of a woman. Of
which Son some shadowy rays come very close to this world and secure
and control change [of bodies and] birth. And the beauty of that Son
of Man is till now unrevealed to all men who are misled as to the
offspring of a woman. Nothing then of the things here come into being,
he says, from that Man, nor will they ever do so; but all things that
have come into being have done so not from the whole, but from some
part of the Son of Man. For, says he, the Son of Man is one Iota, one
tittle flowing from on high, full, and filling full all things, and
containing within itself whatever the Man, Father of the Son of Man
possesses.[54]