Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II — David Hume — John Shaqi
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II
David Hume · en
[Footnote 45: The source of this chapter can hardly have been a written
book or MS. The style is distinctly that of Hippolytus himself; the
passion for plays on words which he has before exhibited, but has kept
under restraint while quoting from serious writers like Basilides
and Valentinus, here resumes its sway; and he adds to it a fancy for
putting several nominatives in apposition without the τουτέστι which he
has heretofore generally employed. This, and the nature of the rhetoric
all go to show that he is here quoting not from a written, but from a
spoken discourse. The author of this is of course unknown to us; and
Hippolytus, who may very likely have forgotten his name, gives us no
clue to his identity; but it is fairly clear that he must have been a
follower of Valentinus. The Three Aeons who went forth from the first
ἀρχὴ τῶν ὅλων correspond to the Nous, Logos and Anthropos who rule
over the Valentinian Ogdoad, Decad and Dodecad, and the care taken
to bring the number of Aeons up to thirty practically settles this,
while the existence of Horos is hinted at, and that of the Sophia is
barred only by the attribution of both sexes to all the Aeons. Perhaps,
however, the most striking proof of Valentinianism is the myth of all
the Aeons coalescing to produce the Jesus who brings salvation, a myth
which is not to be found in any other system. If the theory be accepted
that Hippolytus’ source for the chapter was a Valentinian sermon, the
name of Julius Cassianus as its author deserves consideration. He is
described by Clement of Alexandria (_Strom._, III, 13, sqq.) as the
founder of Docetism, and as connected with the school of Valentinus,
while certain Logia quoted by him appear also in the Valentinian
_Excerpta Theodoti_. For other particulars about him see _D.C.B._,
s.nn. “Cassianus” and “Docetism.”]