[Footnote 50: Here again there is nothing which cannot be found in Book VIII (see pp. 99-105 _supra_), from which this chapter is evidently taken. As has before been said, the summarizer to arrive at this has omitted all mention of Satornilus, Menander and Carpocrates, while the other systems mentioned in Book VII, he has placed after the Docetae instead of before them.] [Footnote 51: The summarizer here uses for the first time in our text the expression “First Man,” which plays so large a part in later heresies such as Manichæism. For its early appearance in Western Asia and its influence see Bousset’s _Hauptprobleme der Gnosis_, c. 4, “Der Urmensch,” and _Forerunners_, I, p. lxi, and II, pp. 292, 293.] [Footnote 52: πάθη. He evidently refers to the ten plagues as on p. 109 _supra_.] [Footnote 53: He omits the “My God ... my understanding” of the letter to Theophrastus, on p. 110 _supra_.] [Footnote 54: He alters the ἐξιδιοποιούμενος (cf. p. 415 Cr.) to κατιδιοποιούμενος--a fair proof of the inaccuracy of the scribe. Except for the inaccuracies noted, however, there is no statement in this summary which cannot be found in Book VIII, pp. 106-111 _supra_.] [Footnote 55: For these few lines, the summarizer has evidently not taken the trouble to refer to the author’s statements about Tatian in Book VIII, p. 111 _supra_. He now omits all reference to Justin Martyr, there said to be Tatian’s teacher, and to Tatian’s peculiar ideas about the salvation of Adam; while he introduces a special world-creating aeon not mentioned elsewhere.] [Footnote 56: Here he omits the heresies of the Quartodecimans and the Encratites, which receive notice in Book VIII, pp. 113, 115, 116 _supra_, and passes on to Marcion, who was a contemporary of Valentinus. It is plain, therefore, that he does not attempt in the summary to keep either to order of date or to that of the earlier books.] [Footnote 57: οὐδὲν ὅλως πεποιηκέναι. So the Codex. Some word seems to be missing; but perhaps the passage should read οὐδὲν τῶν ὅλων, “none of the universals.”] [Footnote 58: ἀλόγως, “unreasonably.”] [Footnote 59: Matt. vii. 18.] [Footnote 60: This also is certainly not taken from the chapters on Marcion in Book VII, pp. 82-90 _supra_, which are mainly devoted to an attempt to prove Marcion to have plagiarized from Empedocles. Nor is it from Irenæus or from the tractate _Adversus omnes hæreses_.] [Footnote 61: συντάγματα, “summaries”?] [Footnote 62: The substance of this can be found in the account of Apelles in Book VII, pp. 96-97 _supra_; but the summarizer does not use the phrases of the earlier book, and he can hardly have had it before him.] [Footnote 63: As before (p. 389 Cr.), Macmahon here translates καὶ δυνάμεις ἐπιτελέσαι, “he wrought miracles.”]