Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II
David Hume · en
[Footnote 124: πνεῦμα, a manifest slip for Ἀήρ as before.]
[Footnote 125: στοργή, as in the N. T.]
[Footnote 126: ὀλέθριον.]
[Footnote 127: εἰς τὸ ἓν ἀποκαταστάσεως. The Codex has τὸν ἕνα. That
the meaning is as given above, see p. 373 Cr., where we find ἐκ πολλῶν
ποιήσῃ τὸ ἕν κ.τ.λ.]
[Footnote 128: ll. 110, 111, Stein. In p. 274 Cr., _supra_, these lines
are quoted as the opinions of “the Pythagoreans.”]
[Footnote 129: τὸ πᾶν, not τὸ ὅλον. See n. on I, p. 35 _supra_.]
[Footnote 130: ἰδέα, “species”; so Cruice.]
[Footnote 131: κλάδοι, lit., “branches.”]
[Footnote 132: ll. 107, 205, Karsten.]
[Footnote 133: l. 7, Karsten; 381, Stein.]
[Footnote 134: ll. 4, Karsten; 372, 373, Stein.]
[Footnote 135: l. 5, Karsten; 374, Stein.]
[Footnote 136: νοητός, “that which can be understood by the mind rather
than by the senses.”]
[Footnote 137: εἴδεα θνητῶν, “forms of mortals.”]
[Footnote 138: ll. 6, Karsten; 375, 376, Stein.]
[Footnote 139: ll. 15-19, Karsten; 377-380, Stein.]
[Footnote 140: μεμερισμένου, _minutatim divisi_, Cr.]
[Footnote 141: ἐγκρατεῖς εἶναι, “to be abstainers.”]
[Footnote 142: ll. 1, 2, Karsten; 369, 370, Stein.]
[Footnote 143: νοητήν, as before.]
[Footnote 144: ἐπινοεῖσθαι.]
[Footnote 145: Reading for ἀδινῇσιν ... πραπίδεσσιν, ἰδυιῄσι
πραπίδεσσιν, as in Hom., _Il._, I, 608.]
[Footnote 146: Φύσις ἑκάστῳ, “the nature of each one”?]
[Footnote 147: Cf. ll. 313 _sqq._, Karsten, and 222 _sqq._, Stein.
Schneidewin has restored the very bad text in _Philologus_, VI, 166.
But the lines are still obscure--even for Empedocles. They seem to hint
at a hidden meaning, to be got by study.]
[Footnote 148: κολοβοδάκτυλος. See _Journal of Classical and Sacred
Philology_ (Cambridge), March 1855, p. 87. The story of St. Mark
cutting off his thumb to make himself ineligible for the priesthood is
quoted by Cruice from St. Jerome.]
[Footnote 149: ἀντιπαράθεσιν, “the setting over against.”]
[Footnote 150: ὑπολαμβάνεις. Cr. and Macm. both translate, “as you
suppose them to be.” But Marcion could have been in no doubt as to his
own opinions.]
[Footnote 151: Marcion did not say that the Demiurge, whom he probably
identified with the God of the Jews, was wicked. On the contrary, he
said that he was just, though harsh. See _Forerunners_, II, xi.]
[Footnote 152: εὐαγγελίζῃ.]
[Footnote 153: Cf. 1 Tim. iv. 1-5, as quoted in Book VIII, p. 422 Cr.]
[Footnote 154: Reading τοὺς σεαυτοῦ μαθητάς for the τοὺς ἑαυτοῦ μαθητάς
of the text.]