The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part B.: From Henry III. to Richard III.
David Hume · en
There was a sensible decay of ecclesiastical authority during this
period. The disgust which the laity had received from the numerous
usurpations both of the court of Rome and of their own clergy, had very
much weaned the kingdom from superstition; and strong symptoms appeared,
from time to time, of a general desire to shake off the bondage of the
Romish church. In the committee of eighteen, to whom Richard’s last
parliament delegated their whole power, there is not the name of one
ecclesiastic to be found; a neglect which is almost without example,
while the Catholic religion subsisted in England.[**] [17]
* Peruse, in this view, the Abridgment of the Records, by
Sir Robert Cotton, during these two reigns.
** See note Q, at the end of the volume.
The aversion entertained against the established church soon found
principles, and tenets, and reasonings, by which it could justify and
support itself. John Wickliffe, a secular priest, educated at Oxford,
began in the latter end of Edward III. to spread the doctrine of
reformation by his discourses, sermons, and writings; and he made many
disciples among men of all ranks and stations. He seems to have been a
man of parts and learning; and has the honor of being the first person
in Europe that publicly called in question those principles which had
universally passed for certain and undisputed during so many ages.
Wickliffe himself, as well as his disciples, who received the name of
Wickliffites, or Lollards, was distinguished by a great austerity
of life and manners; a circumstance common to almost all those who
dogmatize in any new way; both because men who draw to them the
attention of the public, and expose themselves to the odium of great
multitudes, are obliged to be very guarded in their conduct, and because
few who have a strong propensity to pleasure or business, will enter
upon so difficult and laborious an undertaking. The doctrines of
Wickliffe being derived from his search into the Scriptures and into
ecclesiastical antiquity, were nearly the same with those which were
propagated by the reformers in the sixteenth century: he only carried
some of them farther than was done by the more sober part of these
reformers. He denied the doctrine of the real presence, the supremacy of
the church of Rome, the merit of monastic vows: he maintained, that the
Scriptures were the sole rule of faith; that the church was dependent
on the state, and should be reformed by it; that the clergy ought to
possess no estates; that the begging friars were a nuisance, and ought
not to be supported;[*] that the numerous ceremonies of the church
were hurtful to true piety: he asserted that oaths were unlawful, that
dominion was founded in grace, that everything was subject to fate and
destiny, and that all men were preordained either to eternal salvation
or reprobation,[**] From the whole of his doctrines, Wickliffe appears
to have been strongly tinctured with enthusiasm, and to have