The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part C.: From Henry VII. to Mary
David Hume · en
{1530.} Several universities of Europe, therefore, without hesitation,
as well as without interest or reward,[*] gave verdict in the king’s
favor; not only those of France, Paris, Orleans, Bourges, Toulouse,
Angiers, which might be supposed to lie under the influence of their
prince, ally to Henry; but also those of Italy, Venice, Ferrara, Padua;
even Bologna itself, though under the immediate jurisdiction of Clement.
Oxford alone[**] and Cambridge* made some difficulty; because these
universities, alarmed at the progress of Lutheranism, and dreading a
defection from the holy see, scrupled to give their sanction to
measures whose consequences they feared would prove fatal to the ancient
religion. Their opinion, however, conformable to that of the other
universities of Europe, was at last obtained; and the king, in order to
give more weight to all these authorities, engaged his nobility to write
a letter to the pope, recommending his cause to the holy father, and
threatening him with the most dangerous consequences in case of a denial
of justice.[***] The convocations, too, both of Canterbury and York,
pronounced the king’s marriage invalid, irregular, and contrary to the
law of God, with which no human power had authority to dispense.[****]
* Herbert. Burnet.
** Wood, Hist. and Ant. Ox. lib. i. p. 225.
*** Burnet, vol. i, p. 6.
**** Rymer, vol. xiv. p. 405. Burnet, vol. i. p. 95.
But Clement, lying still under the influence of the emperor, continued
to summon the king to appear, either by himself or proxy, before his
tribunal at Rome; and the king, who knew that he could expect no fair
trial there, refused to submit to such a condition, and would not
even admit of any citation, which he regarded as a high insult, and a
violation of his royal prerogative. The father of Anne Boleyn, created
earl of Wiltshire, carried to the pope the king’s reasons for not
appearing by proxy; and, as the first instance of disrespect from
England, refused to kiss his holiness’s foot which he very graciously
held out to him for that purpose.[*]
The extremities to which Henry was pushed, both against the pope and the
ecclesiastical order, were naturally disagreeable to Cardinal Wolsey;
and as Henry foresaw his opposition, it is the most probable reason that
can be assigned for his renewing the prosecution against his ancient
favorite. After Wolsey had remained some time at Asher, he was allowed
to remove to Richmond, a palace which he had received as a present from
Henry, in return for Hampton Court; but the courtiers, dreading still
his vicinity to the king, procured an order for him to remove to his
see of York. The cardinal knew it was in vain to resist: he took up his
residence at Cawood, in Yorkshire, where he rendered himself extremely
popular in the neighborhood by his affability and hospitality;[**] but
he was not allowed to remain long unmolested in this retreat.
* Burnet, vol. i. p. 94.
** Cavendish. Stowe, p. 551.