The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part C.: From Henry VII. to Mary
David Hume · en
Thus died this famous cardinal, whose character seems to have contained
as singular a variety as the fortune to which he was exposed. The
obstinacy and violence of the king’s temper may alleviate much of the
blame which some of his favorite’s measures have undergone; and when
we consider, that the subsequent part of Henry’s reign was much more
criminal than that which had been directed by Wolsey’s counsels, we
shall be inclined to suspect those historians of partiality, who
have endeavored to load the memory of this minister with such violent
reproaches. If, in foreign politics, he sometimes employed his influence
over the king for his private purposes, rather than his master’s
service, which, he boasted, he had solely at heart, we must remember,
that he had in view the papal throne; a dignity which, had he attained
it, would have enabled him to make Henry a suitable return for all his
favors. The cardinal of Amboise, whose memory is respected in France,
always made this apology for his own conduct, which was, in some
respect, similar to Wolsey’s; and we have reason to think, that Henry
was well acquainted with the views by which his minister was influenced,
and took a pride in promoting them. He much regretted his death, when
informed of it, and always spoke favorably of his memory; a proof that
humor, more than reason, or any discovery of treachery, had occasioned
the last persecutions against him.
{1531.} A new session of parliament was held, together with a
convocation; and the king here gave strong proofs of his extensive
authority, as well as of his intention to turn it to the depression
of the clergy. As an ancient statute, now almost obsolete, had been
employed to ruin Wolsey, and render his exercise of the legatine power
criminal, notwithstanding the king’s permission, the same law was now
turned against the ecclesiastics. It was pretended, that every one who
had submitted to the legatine court, that is, the whole church, had
violated the statute of provisors; and the attorney-general accordingly
brought an indictment against them.[*] The convocation knew, that it
would be in vain to oppose reason or equity to the king’s arbitrary
will, or plead that their ruin would have been the certain consequence
of not submitting to Wolsey’s commission, which was procured by Henry’s
consent, and supported by his authority. They chose, therefore, to throw
themselves on the mercy of their sovereign; and they agreed to pay
a hundred and eighteen thousand eight hundred and forty pounds for a
pardon.[**] A confession was likewise extorted from them, that the
king was the protector and the supreme head of the church and clergy of
England; though some of them had the dexterity to get a clause inserted,
which invalidated the whole submission, and which ran in these terms:
“in so far as is permitted by the law of Christ.”