The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part C.: From Henry VII. to Mary
David Hume · en
The innocence of the duke of Norfolk was still, if possible, more
apparent than that of his son; and his services to the crown had been
greater. His duchess, with whom he lived on bad terms, had been so base
as to carry intelligence to his enemies of all she knew against him:
Elizabeth Holland, a mistress of his, had been equally subservient to
the designs of the court; yet with all these advantages, his accusers
discovered no greater crime than his once saying, that the king was
sickly, and could not hold out long; and the kingdom was likely to fall
into disorders, through the diversity of religious opinions. He wrote a
pathetic letter to the king, pleading his past services and protesting
his innocence: soon after, he embraced a more proper expedient for
appeasing Henry, by making a submission and confession, such as his
enemies required; but nothing could mollify the unrelenting temper of
the king. He assembled a parliament, as the surest and most expeditious
instrument of his tyranny; and the house of peers, without examining the
prisoner, without trial or evidence, passed a bill of attainder against
him, and sent it down to the commons. Cranmer, though engaged for many
years in an opposite party to Norfolk, and though he had received
many and great injuries from him, would have no hand in so unjust a
prosecution; and he retired to his seat at Croydon.[*] The king was now
approaching fast towards his end; and fearing lest Norfolk should escape
him, he sent a message to the commons, by which he desired them to
hasten the bill, on pretence that Norfolk enjoyed the dignity of earl
marshal, and it was necessary to appoint another, who might officiate
at the ensuing ceremony of installing his son prince of Wales. The
obsequious commons obeyed his directions, though founded on so frivolous
a pretence; and the king having affixed the royal assent to the bill by
commissioners, issued orders for the execution of Norfolk on the morning
of the twenty-ninth of January. But news being carried to the Tower that
the king himself had expired that night, the lieutenant deferred obeying
the warrant; and it was not thought advisable by the council to begin a
new reign by the death of the greatest nobleman in the kingdom, who had
been condemned by a sentence so unjust and tyrannical.