The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
in which he had been strictly educated; and to which he had hitherto
religiously adhered: that as he would, by such an apostasy, totally
alienate all the Protestants in Scotland and England, he could never
gain the confidence of the Catholics, who would still entertain
reasonable doubts of his sincerity: that by advancing a present claim
to the crown, he forfeited the certain prospect of his succession;
and revived that national animosity which the late peace and alliance
between the kingdoms had happily extinguished: that the whole gentry and
nobility of England had openly declared themselves for the execution of
the queen of Scots; and if James showed such violent resentment against
that act of justice, they would be obliged, for their own security, to
prevent forever so implacable a prince from ruling over them: and
that, however some persons might represent his honor as engaged to seek
vengeance for the present affront and injury, the true honor of a prince
consisted in wisdom, and moderation, and justice, not in following the
dictates of blind passion, or in pursuing revenge at the expense of
every motive and every interest.[*]
* Strype, vol. iii. p. 377. Spotswood.
These considerations, joined to the peaceable, unambitious temper of the
young prince, prevailed over his resentment, and he fell gradually into
a good correspondence with the court of England. It is probable that the
queen’s chief object in her dissimulation with regard to the execution
of Mary, was, that she might thereby afford James a decent pretence for
renewing his amity with her, on which their mutual interests so much
depended.