The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
That she was well assured that other foreign princes, Mary’s near
relations, had embraced the same resolution; but, for her part, the late
events had touched her heart with more tender sympathy, and had made
her adopt measures more favorable to the liberty and interests of the
unhappy queen: that she was determined not to see her oppressed by her
rebellious subjects, but would employ all her good offices, and even her
power, to redeem her from captivity, and place her in such a condition
as would at once be compatible with her dignity and the safety of her
subjects: that she conjured her to lay aside all thoughts of revenge,
except against the murderers of her husband; and as she herself was
his near relation, she was better entitled than the subjects of Mary to
interpose her authority on that head; and she therefore besought that
princess, if she had any regard to her own honor and safety, not to
oppose so just and reasonable a demand: that after those two points
were provided for, her own liberty and the punishment of her husband’s
assassins, the safety of her infant son was next to be considered; and
there seemed no expedient more proper for that purpose, than sending him
to be educated in England: and that, besides the security which would
attend his removal from a scene of faction and convulsions, there were
many other beneficial consequences, which it was easy to foresee as the
result of his education in that country.[*]
* Keith, p. 411, 412, etc
The remonstrances which Throgmorton was instructed to make to the
associated lords, were entirely conformable to these sentiments which
Elizabeth entertained in Mary’s favor. She empowered him to tell them,
that whatever blame she might throw on Mary’s conduct, any opposition
to their sovereign was totally unjustifiable, and incompatible with all
order and good government: that it belonged not to them to reform, much
less to punish, the maleadministration of their prince; and the only
arms which subjects could in any case lawfully employ against the
supreme authority, were entreaties, counsels, and representations: that
if these expedients failed, they were next to appeal by their prayers to
Heaven, and to wait with patience till the Almighty, in whose hands are
the hearts of princes, should be pleased to turn them to justice and
to mercy. That she inculcated not this doctrine because she herself was
interested in its observance, but because it was universally received in
all well-governed states, and was essential to the preservation of civil
society: that she required them to restore their queen to liberty; and
promised, in that case, to concur with them in all proper expedients for
regulating the government, for punishing the king’s murderers, and for
guarding the life and liberty of the infant prince: and that, if
the services which she had lately rendered the Scottish nation, in
protecting them from foreign usurpation, were duly considered by them,