The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
What retarded the execution of these projected changes, was the
difficulty of satisfying all those who, from their activity and
authority in parliament, had pretensions for offices, and who still had
it in their power to embarrass and distress the public measures. Their
associates too in popularity, whom the king intended to distinguish by
his favor, were unwilling to undergo the reproach of having driven a
separate bargain, and of sacrificing to their own ambitious views the
cause of the nation. And as they were sensible that they must owe their
preferment entirely to their weight and consideration in parliament,
they were most of them resolved still to adhere to that assembly, and
both to promote its authority, and to preserve their own credit in it.
On all occasions, they had no other advice to give the king, than to
allow himself to be directed by his great council; or, in other words,
to resign himself passively to their guidance and government. And
Charles found, that instead of acquiring friends by the honors and
offices which he should bestow, he should only arm his enemies with more
power to hurt him.
The end on which the king was most intent in changing ministers was,
to save the life of the earl of Strafford, and to mollify, by these
indulgences, the rage of his most furious prosecutors. But so high was
that nobleman's reputation for experience and capacity, that all the new
counsellors and intended ministers plainly saw, that if he escaped their
vengeance, he must return into favor and authority; and they regarded
his death as the only security which they could have, both for the
establishment of their present power, and for success in their future
enterprises. His impeachment, therefore, was pushed on with the utmost
vigor; and, after long and solemn preparations, was brought to a final
issue.
Immediately after Strafford was sequestered from parliament, and
confined in the Tower, a committee of thirteen was chosen by the lower
house, and intrusted with the office of preparing a charge against him.
These, joined to a small committee of lords, were vested with authority
to examine all witnesses, to call for every paper, and to use any
means of scrutiny, with regard to any part of the earl's behavior and
conduct.[*] After so general and unbounded an inquisition, exercised by
such powerful and implacable enemies, a man must have been very cautious
or very innocent, not to afford, during the whole course of his life,
some matter of accusation against him.
This committee, by direction from both houses, took an oath of
secrecy; a practice very unusual, and which gave them the appearance of
conspirators, more than ministers of justice.[**] But the intention of
this strictness was, to render it more difficult for the earl to elude
their search, or prepare for his justification.