The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
The king, upon his return from Scotland, was received in London with the
shouts and acclamations of the people, and with every demonstration
of regard and affection.[*] Sir Richard Gournay, lord mayor, a man of
moderation and authority, had promoted these favorable dispositions, and
had engaged the populace, who so lately insulted the king, and who so
soon after made furious war upon him, to give him these marks of their
dutiful attachment. But all the pleasure which Charles reaped from this
joyous reception, was soon damped by the remonstrance of the commons,
which was presented him, together with a petition of a like strain. The
bad counsels which he followed are there complained of; his concurrence
in the Irish rebellion plainly insinuated; the scheme laid for the
introduction of Popery and superstition inveighed against; and, as a
remedy for all these evils, he is desired to intrust every office
and command to persons in whom his parliament should have cause to
confide.[**]
* Rush. vol. v. p. 429.
** Bush. vol. v. p. 437. Nalson, vol. ii. p. 692.
By this phrase, which is so often repeated in all the memorials
and addresses of that time, the commons meant themselves and their
adherents.
As soon as the remonstrance of the commons was published the king
dispersed an answer to it. In this contest, he lay under great
disadvantages. Not only the ears of the people were extremely prejudiced
against him; the best topics upon which he could justify, at least
apologize for his former conduct, were such as it was not safe or
prudent for him at this time to employ. So high was the national
idolatry towards parliaments, that to blame the past conduct of these
assemblies would have been very ill received by the generality of the
people. So loud were the complaints against regal usurpations, that had
the king asserted the prerogative of supplying, by his own authority,
the deficiencies in government arising from the obstinacy of the
commons, he would have increased the clamors with which the whole nation
already resounded. Charles, therefore, contented himself with observing
in general, that even during that period so much complained of, the
people enjoyed a great measure of happiness, not only comparatively,
in respect of their neighbors, but even in respect of those times which
were justly accounted the most fortunate. He made warm protestations
of sincerity in the reformed religion; he promised indulgence to tender
consciences with regard to the ceremonies of the church; he mentioned
his great concessions to national liberty; he blamed the infamous libels
every where dispersed against his person and the national religion; he
complained of the general reproaches thrown out in the remonstrance
with regard to ill counsels, though he had protected no minister from
parliamentary justice, retained no unpopular servant, and conferred
offices on no one who enjoyed not a high character and estimation in the
public.