The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
Never was a quarrel more unreal than seemed at first than between the
contending parties: almost every advantage lay against the royal cause.
The king's revenue had been seized from the beginning by the parliament,
who issued out to him from time to time small sums for his present
subsistence; and as soon as he withdrew to York, they totally stopped
all payments. London, and all the seaports, except Newcastle, being in
their hands, the customs yielded them a certain and considerable supply
of money; and all contributions, loans, and impositions were more easily
raised from the cities, which possessed the ready money, and where men
lived under their inspection, than they could be levied by the king in
those open countries which after some time declared for him.
The seamen naturally followed the disposition of the sea ports to which
they belonged: and the earl of Northumberland, lord admiral, having
embraced the party of the parliament, had appointed, at their desire,
the earl of Warwick to be his lieutenant; who at once established his
authority in the fleet, and kept the entire dominion of the sea in the
hands of that assembly.
All the magazines of arms and amunition were from the first seized by
the parliament; and their fleet intercepted the greater part of those
which were sent by the queen from Holland. The king was obliged, in
order to arm his followers, to borrow the weapons of the train bands,
under promise of restoring them as soon as peace should be settled in
the kingdom.
The veneration for parliaments was at this time extreme throughout the
nation.[*] The custom of reviling those assemblies for corruption, as
it had no pretence, so was it unknown during all former ages. Few or no
instances of their encroaching ambition or selfish claims had hitherto
been observed. Men considered the house of commons in no other light
than as the representatives of the nation, whose interest was the same
with that of the public, who were the eternal guardians of law and
liberty, and whom no motive, but the necessary defence of the people,
could ever engage in an opposition to the crown. The torrent, therefore,
of general affection ran to the parliament. What is the great advantage
of popularity, the privilege of affixing epithets fell of course to that
party. The king's adherents were the wicked and the malignant: their
adversaries were the godly and the well-affected. And as the force of
the cities was more united than that of the country, and at once gave
shelter and protection to the parliamentary party, who could easily
suppress the royalists in their neighborhood, almost the whole kingdom,
at the commencement of the war, seemed to be in the hands of the
parliament.[**]
* Walker p 336.
** Warwick, p. 318.