The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
entirely annihilated in this country, his very passion for prelacy and
for religious ceremonies must lead him to invade a church which he has
ever been taught to regard as anti-Christian and unlawful. Let us but
consider who the persons are that compose the factions now so furiously
engaged in arms. Does not the parliament consist of those very men who
have ever opposed all war with Scotland, who have punished the authors
of our oppressions, who have obtained us the redress of every grievance,
and who, with many honorable expressions, have conferred on us an
ample reward for our brotherly assistance? And is not the court full
of Papists, prelates, malignants; all of them zealous enemies to
our religious model, and resolute to sacrifice their lives for their
idolatrous establishments? Not to mention our own necessary security can
we better express our gratitude to Heaven for that pure light with which
we are, above all nations, so eminently distinguished, than by conveying
the same divine knowledge to our unhappy neighbors, who are wading
through a sea of blood in order to attain it? These were in Scotland the
topics of every conversation: with these doctrines the pulpits echoed:
and the famous curse of Meroz, that curse so solemnly denounced and
reiterated against neutrality and moderation, resounded from all
quarters.[**]
* Rush, vol. vi. p. 390. Clarendon, vol. iii. p. 68.
** Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the Lord; curse ye
bitterly the inhabitants thereof: because they came not to
the help of the Lord, to the help of the Lord against the
mighty. Judges, chap. v ver. 23.
The parliament of England had ever invited the Scots, from the
commencement of the civil dissensions, to interpose their mediation,
which they knew would be so little favorable to the king: and the king
for that very reason had ever endeavored, with the least offensive
expressions, to decline it.[*] Early this spring, the earl of Loudon,
the chancellor, with other commissioners, and attended by Henderson,
a popular and intriguing preacher, was sent to the king at Oxford, and
renewed the offer of mediation; but with the same success as before. The
commissioners were also empowered to press the king on the article of
religion, and to recommend to him the Scottish model of ecclesiastic
worship and discipline. This was touching Charles in a very tender
point: his honor his conscience, as well as his interest, he believed to
be intimately concerned in supporting prelacy and the liturgy.[**] [14]
He begged the commissioners, therefore, to remain satisfied with the
concessions which he had made to Scotland; and having modelled their own
church according to their own principles, to leave their neighbors in
the like liberty, and not to intermeddle with affairs of which they
could not be supposed competent judges.[***]
* Rush. vol. vi. p. 398.
** See note N, at the end of the volume.
*** Bush. vol. vi. p. 462.