The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
The king, when he considered the proposals, and the disposition of the
parliament, could not expect any accommodation, and had no prospect but
of war, or of total submission and subjection: yet, in order to satisfy
his own party, who were impatient for peace, he agreed to send the duke
of Richmond and earl of Southampton with an answer to the proposals
of the parliament, and at the same time to desire a treaty upon their
mutual demands and pretensions.[*] It now became necessary for him to
retract his former declaration, that the two houses at Westminster were
not a free parliament; and accordingly he was induced, though with
great reluctance, to give them, in his answer, the appellation of the
parliament of England.[**] But it appeared afterwards, by a letter which
he wrote to the queen, and of which a copy was taken at Naseby, that
he secretly entered an explanatory protest in his council book; and he
pretended, that though he had called them the parliament, he had not
thereby acknowledged them for such.[***] This subtlety, which has been
frequently objected to Charles, is the most noted of those very few
instances from which the enemies of this prince have endeavored to
load him with the imputation of insincerity; and have inferred that
the parliament could repose no confidence in his professions and
declarations, not even in his laws and statutes. There is, however, it
must be confessed, a difference universally avowed between simply giving
to men the appellation which they assume, and the formal acknowledgment
of their title to it; nor is any thing more common and familiar in all
public transactions.
* Whitlocke, p. 110.
** Whitlocke, p. 111 Dugdale, p. 748.
*** His words are, "As for my calling those at London a
parliament, I shall refer thee to Digby for particular
satisfaction. This in general: if there had been but two
besides myself of my opinion, I had not done it; and the
argument that prevailed with me was, that the calling did no
ways acknowledge them to be a parliament; upon which
condition and construction I did it, and no otherwise; and
accordingly it is registered in the council books, with the
council's unanimous approbation." The King's Cabinet opened.
Rush. vol. i. p. 943.
The time and place of treaty being settled, sixteen commissioners from
the king met at Uxbridge with twelve authorized by the parliament,
attended by the Scottish commissioners. It was agreed, that the Scottish
and parliamentary commissioners should give in their demands with regard
to three important articles, religion, the militia, and Ireland; and
that these should be successively discussed in conference with the
king's commissioners.[*] It was soon found impracticable to come to any
agreement with regard to any of these articles.