The Beauty and the Bolshevist — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Beauty and the Bolshevist
John Stuart Mill · en
“Exactly,” answered Mr. Cord. “You’ve put it in a nutshell. Crystal,
I’m going to tell you what these radicals really are—they’re
failures—everyone of them. Sincere enough—they want the world changed
because they haven’t been able to get along in it as it is—they want a
new deal because they don’t know how to play their cards; and when they
get a new hand, they’ll play it just as badly. It’s not their theories
I object to, but them themselves. You think if you married Moreton
you’d be going into a great new world of idealism. You wouldn’t. You’d
be going into a world of failure—of the pettiest, most futile quarrels
in the world. The chief characteristic of the man who fails is that he
always believes it’s the other fellow’s fault; and they hate the man
who differs with them by one per cent more than they hate the man who
differs by one hundred. Has there ever been a revolution where they did
not persecute their fellow revolutionists worse than they persecuted
the old order, or where the new rule wasn’t more tyrannical than the
old?”
“No one would dispute that,” said Ben. “It is the only way to win
through to—”
“Ah,” said Cord, “I know what you’re going to say, but I tell you, you
win through to liberal practices when, and only when, the conservatives
become converted to your ideas, and put them through for you. That’s
why I say I have no quarrel with radical doctrines—they are coming,
always coming, but”—Cord paused to give his words full weight—“I hate
the radical.”
There was a little pause. Crystal, who had sunk into a low chair,
raised her eyes to Ben, as if she expected a passionate contradiction
from him, but it did not come.
“Yes,” he said, after a moment, “that’s all true, Mr. Cord—with
limitations; but, granting it, you’ve put my side, too. What are we to
say of the conservative—the man who has no vision of his own—who has to
go about stealing his beliefs from the other side? He’s very efficient
at putting _them_ into effect—but efficient as a tool, as a servant.
Look at the mess he makes of his own game when he tries to act on his
own ideas. He crushes democracy with an iron efficiency, and he creates
communism. He closes the door to trade-unionism and makes a revolution.
That’s efficiency for you. We radicals are not so damned inefficient,
while we let the conservatives do our work for us.”