The Millbank Case: A Maine Mystery of To-day — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Millbank Case: A Maine Mystery of To-day
John Stuart Mill · en
It called to mind very forcibly, however, the tale that McManus had
told him of the rifling of Wing’s desk, and caused him to take a
professional view of the incident. He had said at the time that a pair
of trained eyes would have seen something of importance. He was thus
placed on his mettle to prove his boast. In fact, there was little to
see. It was evident that the intruder had come by a window opening on
to the roof of a long porch. A dusty footprint on the carpet under the
window, pointing inward, proved this, and Trafford was able to find
traces along the roof to a hall window, but the returning tracks were
not traceable. He was not so much offended at the liberty taken with
his property as by the implication on his sagacity, in the expectation
of finding anything he preferred should remain unfound.
He had his suspicions as to the person who had ransacked Wing’s desk,
and it was a satisfaction to be given an opportunity to test that
suspicion by this later act. If he could bring it home to the possible
culprit in the former case, he felt that a very considerable advance
would be made. It was true that the method smacked a trifle of seeking
facts with which to sustain a preconceived opinion, rather than
permitting facts to lead up to judgment; but strict adherence to rule
was not always possible, and this appeared a case in which exception
was to be made.
Because, however, of this yielding to temptation, possibly, it troubled
him more to discover that the assumed trespasser on Wing’s desk could
by no means be the culprit in the present case, for it was beyond
controversy that the suspected individual had not been within many
miles of the Millbank hostelry at the hour of the intrusion. It might
be a touch of cunning, but the alibi was not to be questioned. None the
less, here was the fact that Wing’s desk was broken open because he
was believed to be in possession of certain papers of a compromising
character, and that when it was believed that these papers had come
into the possession of the detective, his room and papers were in turn
ransacked. That there was connection of cause and effect between the
facts was scarcely to be doubted, even though it was not as simple as
he had at first supposed to establish it.