_Paulinions_, from Eustathius and Paulin us bishops of Antioch. As also _Homousians_, because they kept to the doctrine of the [--------], which declared the Son of God to be of the same substance with the Father. The author of the _Opus Imperfection_ on St. Matthew, under the name of Chrysostom*, styles them expressly, _Haeresis Homoousianorum_,' the heresy of the Homoousians.' And so Serapion in his conflict with Arnobius** calls them _Homousianates_,which the printed copy reads corruptly _Homuncionates_, which was a name for the Nestorians. The Cataphrygians or Montanists commonly called the orthodox [--------], 'carnal'; because they rejected the prophecies and pretexted inspirations of Montanus, and would not receive his rigid laws about fasting, nor abstain from second marriages, and observe four Lents in a year, &c. This was Tertullian's ordinary compliment to the Christians in all his books** written after he was fallen into the errors of Montanus. He calls his own party the _spiritual_, and the orthodox the _carnal_: and * Opus Imperf. Horn. 48. ** Conflict. Arnob. et Serap. ad cakem Irenaei, p. 519. *** Tertul. adv. Prax. c. 1. Nos quidem agnitio Paracleti disjunxit a Psychicis. Id. de Monogam. c. 1. Haeretici nuptias auferunt, Psychici ingerunt. See also c. 11. and 16. {112} some of his books* are expressly entitled, _Adversus Psychicos_. Clemens Alexandrinus** observes, the same reproach was also used by other heretics beside the Montanists. And it appears from Irenaeus, that this was an ancient calumny of the Valentinians, who styled themselves the _spiritual_ and the _perfect_, and the orthodox the _secular and carnal_***, who had need of abstinence and good works, which were not necessary for them that were perfect. The Millenaries styled them _Allegorists_, because they expounded the prophecy of the saints reigning a thousand years with Christ, (Rev. xx. 4.) to a mystical and allegorical sense. Whence Euseubius**** observes of Nepos the Egyptian bishop, who wrote for the Millenium, that he entitled his book, [--------], 'A confutation of the Allegorists.' Aetius the Arian gives them the abusive name of [--------]; by which he seems to intimate, that their religion was but temporary, and would * De Jejuniis adv. Psychicos. De Pudicitia, &c. ** Clem. Alex. Strom, lib. 4. p. 511. *** Iren. lib. 1. c 1. p. 29. Nobis quidem, quos Psychicos vocant, et de saeculo esse dicunt, necessarian) con- tinentiam, &c. **** Euseb. lib. 7. c. 24. {113} , shortly have an end; whereas the character was much more applicable to the Arians themselves, whose faith was so lately sprung up in the world; as the author of the dialogues _de Trinitate_, under the name of Athanasius, who confutes Aetius *, justly retorts upon him.