Ocellus Lucanus on the nature of the universe : $b Taurus, the Platonic philosopher, on the eternity of the world. Julius Firmicus Maternus of the thema mundi. Select theorems on the perpetuity of time, by Proclus. — Plato — John Shaqi
Ocellus Lucanus on the nature of the universe : $b Taurus, the Platonic philosopher, on the eternity of the world. Julius Firmicus Maternus of the thema mundi. Select theorems on the perpetuity of time, by Proclus.
Plato · en
_Demonstration._—For, if it is neither continued nor eternal, it will
have a certain beginning. Let, therefore, A B be time, and let its
beginning be A. But if A is time, it is divisible, and we shall not yet
have the beginning of time, but there will be another beginning of the
beginning. But, if A is a moment or _the now_, it will be indivisible,
and the boundary of another time: for _the now_ is not only a beginning,
but an end. There will therefore be time before A. Again: if B is the
boundary of time, if B is time, it may be divided to infinity, and into
the many boundaries which it contains. But if B is _the now_, the same
will also be a beginning: for _the now_ is not only a boundary, but a
beginning[60].
THEOREM 9.
A motion which is naturally circular is perpetual.
_Demonstration._—Let the circular motion be that of the circle A B, I say
that it is perpetual: for, since time is perpetual, it is also necessary
that motion should be perpetual. And since time is continued, (for
there is the same _now_ in the past and present time,) it is necessary
that there should be some one continued motion: for time is the number
of motion. However, all other motions are not perpetual: for they are
generated from contraries into contraries. A circular motion, therefore,
is alone perpetual: for to this, as we have demonstrated, nothing is
contrary. But that all the motions which subsist between contraries,
are bounded, and are not perpetual, we thus demonstrate. Let A B be a
motion between the two contraries A and B. The motion, therefore, of A B
is bounded by A and B, and is not infinite. But the motion from A is not
continued with that from B. But, when that which is moved returns, it
will stand still in B: for, if the motion from A is one continued motion,
and also that from B, that which is moved from B will be moved into the
same. It will therefore be moved in vain, being now in A. But nature
does nothing in vain: and hence, there is not one motion. The motions,
therefore, between contraries are not perpetual. Nor is it possible for
a thing to be moved to infinity in a right line: for contraries are the
boundaries. Nor when it returns will it make one motion.
THEOREM 10.
That which moves a perpetual motion is perpetual.
_Demonstration._—For let A be that which moves a perpetual motion. I say
that A also is perpetual: for, if it is not, it will not then move when
it is not. But this not moving, neither does the motion subsist, which
it moved before. It is however supposed to be perpetual. But, nothing
else moving, that will be immoveable which is perpetually moved. And
if anything else moves when A is no more, the motion is not continual;
which is impossible. Hence, that which moves a perpetual motion is itself
perpetual.
THEOREM 11.
That which is immoveable is the leader of things moving and moved.