The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
[Sidenote: How can they be teachers who are so inconsistent with
themselves?]
_Soc._ And is there anything else of which the professors are
affirmed not only not to be teachers of others, but to be ignorant
themselves, and bad at the knowledge of that which they
are professing to teach? or is there anything about which even
the acknowledged ‘gentlemen’ are sometimes saying that
‘this thing can be taught,’ and sometimes the opposite? Can
you say that they are teachers in any true sense whose ideas
are in such confusion?
_Men._ I should say, certainly not.
_Soc._ But if neither the Sophists nor the gentlemen are
teachers, clearly there can be no other teachers?
_Men._ No.
_Soc._ And if there are no teachers, neither are there disciples?
_Men._ Agreed.
[Sidenote: _Knowledge and Opinion._]
_Soc._ And we have admitted that a thing cannot be taught of
which there are neither teachers nor disciples?
_Men._ We have.
[Sidenote: If there are no teachers and no scholars, virtue cannot be
taught.]
_Soc._ And there are no teachers of virtue to be found anywhere?
_Men._ There are not.
_Soc._ And if there are no teachers, neither are there scholars?
_Men._ That, I think, is true.
_Soc._ Then virtue cannot be taught?
_Men._ Not if we are right in our view. But I cannot believe,
Socrates, that there are no good men: And if there are, how
did they come into existence?
[Sidenote: But were we not mistaken in our view? There may be another
guide to good action as well as knowledge.]
_Soc._ I am afraid, Meno, that you and I are not good for
much, and that Gorgias has been as poor an educator of you
as Prodicus has been of me. Certainly we shall have to
look to ourselves, and try to find some one who will help
in some way or other to improve us. This I say, because
I observe that in the previous discussion none of us remarked
that right and good action is possible to man under other
guidance than that of knowledge (ἐπιστήμη);—and indeed if
this be denied, there is no seeing how there can be any good
men at all.
_Men._ How do you mean, Socrates?
_Soc._ I mean that good men are necessarily useful or
profitable. Were we not right in admitting this? It must 97
be so.
_Men._ Yes.
_Soc._ And in supposing that they will be useful only if they
are true guides to us of action—there we were also right?
_Men._ Yes.
_Soc._ But when we said that a man cannot be a good guide
unless he have knowledge (φρόνησις), in this we were wrong.
_Men._ What do you mean by the word ‘right’?
_Soc._ I will explain. If a man knew the way to Larisa, or
anywhere else, and went to the place and led others thither,
would he not be a right and good guide?
_Men._ Certainly.