1851; Or, The adventures of Mr. and Mrs. Sandboys and family, who came up to London to enjoy themselves, and to see the Great Exhibition. — John Shaqi
1851; Or, The adventures of Mr. and Mrs. Sandboys and family, who came up to London to enjoy themselves, and to see the Great Exhibition.Mayhew, Henry
General
1851; Or, The adventures of Mr. and Mrs. Sandboys and family, who came up to London to enjoy themselves, and to see the Great Exhibition.
Mayhew, Henry
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England) -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction
and, worse than all to Postlethwaite, he discovered, moreover, on
seeking his usual ale at Kirkstile, that Harry Pearson, the landlord,
had accompanied the Buttermere travellers’ train up to town; and that
John Wilkinson, the other landlord, had followed him the day after; so
that there was neither bite nor sup to be had in the place, and no
entertainment either for man or beast.
In pity to Paddy, if not in remembrance of the farmer’s good cheer,
Postlethwaite, on his way back, turned down to Joe Watson’s, at
Lanthwaite, and there found it impossible to make anybody hear him, for
the farmer and his six noble-looking sons—known for miles round as the
flower of the country—had also joined the sight-seers on their way to
the train at Cockermouth.
This was sad news to the little household. It was the first incident
that gave Mrs. Sandboys an insight into the possible difficulties that
their remaining behind, alone, at Hassness, might entail upon the
family. She, and Mr. Sandboys, had hitherto only thought of the
inconveniences attending a visit to London, and little dreamt that their
absence from it, at such a time, might force them to undergo even
greater troubles. She could perhaps have cheerfully tolerated the
abdication of the Cockermouth milliner—she might have heard, without a
sigh, that Mr. Bailey had put up the shutters of his circulating
library, and stopped the supply of “Henrietta Temples,” “Emilia
Wyndhams,” and “The Two Old Men;” she might not even have complained had
Thompson Martin, the draper, cut short her ribbons and laces, by
shutting up his shop altogether—but to have taken away her tea and
sugar, was more than a lady in the vale of years, and the valley of
Buttermere, could be expected to endure, without some outrage to
philosophy!
The partiality of the sex in general for their morning and evening cup
of souchong and “best refined,” is now ranked by physiologists among
those inscrutable instincts of sentient nature, which are beyond the
reach of scientific explanation. What oil is to the Esquimaux, what the
juice of the cocoa-nut is to the monkey, what water is to the fish, what
dew is to the flower, and what milk is to the cat—so is tea to woman! No
person yet, in our own country, has propounded any sufficient theory to
account for the English washerwomen’s all-absorbing love of the Chinese
infusion—nor for the fact of every maid-servant, when stipulating the
terms of her engagement, always making it an express condition of the
hiring, that she should be provided with “tea and sugar,” and of every
mistress continually declaring that she “would rather at any time go
without her dinner than her tea.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account