A-B-C of motion picturesWelsh, Robert E. (Robert Emmet)
History
A-B-C of motion pictures
Welsh, Robert E. (Robert Emmet)
Motion pictures
In the years immediately preceding the organization of this group of
the biggest concerns, the picture itself was not progressing. There
was no longer any novelty in seeing people in motion on the screen,
and the inane subjects shown offered little more than that. While
the pessimists, who, as a matter of fact, had never taken a deep
interest in the motion picture, were predicting its early demise, the
manufacturers set about to find means of renewing the interest. Short
dramas and comedies were written, and players drafted from the stage.
The public responded readily, and once more Fortune smiled upon the
picture-men, never again to desert them.
Until about 1911 the average motion picture was approximately one
thousand feet long, and occasionally two or more distinct subjects
were included on a piece of film this length. The reels on which the
film is wound for easy handling will hold one thousand feet, so that
in the United States a picture of this length came to be known as a
“single-reel” picture. In England and on the Continent this term has
not come into general use, the practice being to state the approximate
length of the film in feet or meters. Though Richard G. Holloman’s
three-thousand-foot or three-reel production of “The Passion Play,”
in 1905, had proved most profitable, the American manufacturers did
not heed the indication that audiences would welcome stories longer
than one thousand feet. Foreign producers were quicker to see the
possibilities of the longer picture, but as recently as 1912 their
productions of greater length than two thousand feet were offered
without response on the American market. Then came the success of “Quo
Vadis?” an Italian multiple-reel picture, exploited in this country by
George Kleine, of Chicago, to whom credit must be given for the rise
of the long production, with its results in placing the picture in the
best theaters in the country. “Quo Vadis?” earned a fortune, and was
followed by a scramble on the part of buyers to get the long-neglected
foreign productions, while the American manufacturers turned their
attention to the staging of multiple-reel pictures.
To-day the short picture, though still forming the bulk of the output,
is somewhat neglected, for the quickest way to the public’s fancy
seems to lie in the big production that rivals the stage-play. In
Europe the long picture is declining in favor, and the picture of one
and two thousand feet returning to popularity. In the United States,
however, it would seem that the future of the motion picture lies in
the production that gives an entire evening’s entertainment, offering,
as it does, opportunities for the exercise of artistic effort that are
denied by the fifteen or thirty minute picture.
II
THE STUDIO--THE MECHANICS OF PICTURE MAKING AND SHOWING
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account