A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
The world is, therefore, related to God in that it follows directly
from the nature of God; God is related to the world in that He is
the logical ground of the world. Is God the creator of the world? No,
He is the world. Is God a person? Is He a self-conscious being like
ourselves,――an individual? No. The thought-aspect of God includes
our thought, but it is the very different infinite thought; the
extension-aspect of God includes our body, but it is the very different
infinite body. God has soul and body and an infinite number of
other aspects. _God is_――an unchanging, self-dependent being, whose
modifications are necessarily determined in their relation to Him and
to one another. Spinoza conceived the character of God exactly from
the nature of geometry. Just as all geometrical conclusions follow from
the nature of space and exist in determined and fixed relations to one
another, so everything finite follows from the nature of the Infinite,
and each finite thing is in a rigid chain of finite things of its own
kind――a chain without beginning or end. The necessity of the divine
nature appears in all, not as a series of emanations from God, but in
a series, each member of which is determined equally by Him.
=The Mysticism of Spinoza.= _From the point of view of man_, mysticism
in speculative or religious thought has reference to the immediate
apprehension of God. Mysticism frequently accompanies pantheism,
and _from the point of view of God_ refers to the oneness of His
all-inclusive nature. Spinoza’s pantheism is also a mysticism which
involves the immediate apprehension of the divine by the human;
it involves the oneness of God and man. More often than otherwise
mysticism is animated by a religious motive, and Spinoza’s philosophy
is profoundly religious. We have already seen similar mysticism in the
Orphic-Pythagorean sect which formed so great a peril to Greek culture
in the sixth century B. C., in the neo-Pythagoreans and neo-Platonists
at the beginning of this era, in many of the churchmen of the Middle
Ages, especially Scotus Erigena and Meister Eckhart. Bruno and many
of the Humanists were mystics, and if we should wish to go outside our
field, we should find mysticism to be the prevailing attitude of mind
of the great Oriental peoples. Mysticism frequently is accompanied by
belief in occult spiritual appearances, but that is not necessarily the
case; nor was it the case with Spinoza. Spinoza’s mysticism was purely
intellectual. Although a religious philosophy with an immediate ethical
bearing upon conduct, it was a scientific relationalism that could not
tolerate the miraculous and the abnormal psychological phenomena (such
as clairvoyance, hallucinations, etc.). Spinoza is, on the contrary,
distinguished as a mystic because he interpreted the universe in
entirely non-human terms. His great service to mysticism lies in
divesting the reality of life of every human attribution and laying
bare a mathematical skeleton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account